When shit happens, we say that we don’t understand God. But maybe it’s just God who didn’t understand us.

I don’t think we need to find ways to help disfigured people adapt to society. I think we need to find ways to help society adapt to disfigured people.

Experiences

1. Publish a comic book, whether online on in print. (Suggestions? Something simple such as a comic book about Wellesley College? Or something artsy-fartsy such as a graphic novel with profound moral themes?)

2. Participate in an extended expedition (e.g. hike a volcano in Nicaragua with Raleigh International).

3. Make a whole box of awesome origami polyhedra.

4. Act in a play.

5. Rock the bald look.

6. Do a whole wall of graffiti. (I wonder if the Jewett Art Museum has graffiti walls? I wonder if I may request for permission to do an entire wall.)

7. Create a funny viral video that racks up at least 10 million hits. (You’re not a true blue American/American-educated kid until you’ve gotten your fifteen minutes of YouTube fame)

8. Read 200 classics from the Western canon.

9. Go bungee jumping and/or skydiving. (Overrated resolutions, but I still want to do them anyway.)

10. Volunteer in Obama’s next presidential campaign.

11. Build my own telescope/robot.

12. Go sea kayaking.

13. Bring a cactus to class. Raise my hand. When the professor points me out, I say that my cactus has a question. Then I stare at my cactus. Repeat until professor snaps. At the end of my class, I scream at my cactus, “You’ve embarrassed me again!!!” (Got this from a website.)

14. Run a marathon.

15. Swim in the lake at freezing temperatures (not Lake Waban, but some other lake that doesn’t have flesh-eating bacteria).

16. Pull off a large-scale social experiment involving hundreds of strangers (e.g. Stanley Milgram’s Six Degrees of Separation).

17. Start a rock band.

18. Give an unexpectedly feminine stage performance.

Skills –specific

19. Learn how to make the Kawasaki Rose (because painstakingly handmade roses are so much more meaningful than purchased roses).

20. Pick up poetry, something that’s always had intimidated me.

21. Pick up the harmonica/guitar.

22. Pick up percussion.

23. Learn how to ride a bicycle.

24. Learn to breakdance.

25. Learn to rap a song backwards (I’ve no idea how I’m going to this).

26. Become competent in at least four martial arts.

27. Become proficient in at least five languages and four dialects.

28. Save/earn enough money for a DSLR so that I can do awesome photography.

29. Pick up basic programming.

30. Resume my childhood hobby of making toys and miniature models from scrap material.

31. Learn how to fix an analog watch.

32. Learn to play chess.

33. Learn how to juggle at least four persimmons.

Travelling

34. Take part in as many international conferences as I can.

35. Spend at least a month in three different continents (North America doesn’t count, of course).

36. Observe (or better still, work in) a war zone.

37. Explore Komodo Island.

Daily habits

38. Get rid of my nail-biting habit once and for all (probably the hardest task on this list).

39. Set aside an hour each day for exercise.

Malaysia-specific

40. Shoot a human rights documentary for Freedom Film Fest.

41. Intern for Sisters in Islam.

42. Climb Mount Kinabalu.

43. Volunteer for Seksualiti Merdeka (a Malaysian sexuality rights carnival started by the indie art community).

Wellesley-specific

44. Win something for Wellesley.

45. Tame a Wellesley squirrel.

46. Sleep in every building (or non-building) in Wellesley.

47. Take an Economics class with Professor Ann Velenchik (shouldn’t this be on every Wellesley student’s list of ‘Things I Need To Do Before I Graduate From College’?).

48. Do a sketch of Green Hall.

49. Create something (Giant Menger Sponge?) that I can donate to the art museum.

50. Draw hamsters all over the campus.

51. Pull off a major prank that’s sure to become the stuff of legends.

52. Attend Dyke Ball with a date.

Boston-specific

53. Go busking in Harvard Square.

54. Attend as many public lectures at Harvard as possible.

55. Take at last one class at MIT.

56. Perform wushu with the wushu team in China Town.

Miscellaneous

57. Make thank you cards for all the campus police officers, cooks, clerks, janitors etc at the end of graduation for taking care of us.

58. Decorate the door of every professor who’s ever taught me.

59. Find a way to bring my family to my graduation convocation.

60. Build priceless friendships.

61. Fall in love (should chance come by).

62. Enjoy college for what it’s worth.

I was a child. I played with Play-dough. I’m still a child. I play with Plato.

So much profundity, so little word choice.

The problem with sarcastic treatment is that it is often lost on those who need it most.

I don’t usually copy-and-paste entire articles like this, but I’ve made an exception for X: A Fabulous Child’s Story by Lois Gould, simply because I think the message of the story –  that gender is largely socially constructed and that forcing children to realize preconstrued notions of masculinity/feminity inhibits their social, metal, emotional, pscyhological and physiological growth more often that not – is in dire need of reading by every member of society.

I’ve also posted this on TiltedWorld.

A Fabulous Child’s Story

by Lois Gould

Once upon a time, a baby named X was born. This baby was named X so that nobody could tell whether it was a boy or a girl. Its parents could tell, of course, but they couldn’t tell anybody else. They couldn’t even tell Baby X at first.

You see, it was all part of a very important Secret Scientific Xperiment, known officially as Project Baby X. The smartest scientists had set up this Xperiment at a cost of Xactly 23 billion dollars and 72 cents, which might seem like a lot for just one baby, even a very important Xperimental baby. But when you remember the prices of things like strained carrots and stuffed bunnies, and popcorn for the movies and booster shots for camp, let alone 28 shiny quarters from the tooth fairy, you begin to see how it adds up.

Also, long before Baby X was born, all those scientists had to be paid to work out the details of the Xperiment, and to write the Official Instruction Manual for Baby X’s parents and, most important of all, to find the right set of parents to bring up Baby X. These parents had to be selected very carefully. Thousands of volunteers had to take thousands of tests and answer thousands of tricky questions. Almost everybody failed because, it turned out, almost everybody really wanted either a baby boy or a baby girl, and not Baby X at all. Also, almost everybody was afraid that a Baby X would be a lot more trouble than a boy or a girl. (They were probably right, the scientists admitted, but Baby X needed parents who wouldn’t mind the Xtra trouble.)

X

There were families with grandparents named Milton and Agatha, who didn’t see why the baby couldn’t be named Milton or Agatha instead of X, even if it was an X. There were families with aunts who insisted on knitting tiny dresses and uncles who insisted on sending tiny baseball mitts. Worst of all, these were families that already had other children who couldn’t be trusted to keep the secret. Certainly not if they knew the secret was worth 23 billion dollars and 72 cents – and all you had to do was take one little peek at Baby X in the bathtub to know if it was a boy or girl.

But, finally, the scientists found the Joneses, who really wanted to raise an X more than any other kind of baby – no matter how much trouble it would be. Ms. and Mr. Jones had to promise they would take equal turns caring for X, and feeding it, and singing it lullabies. And they had to promise never to hire any baby-sitters. The government scientists knew perfectly well that a baby-sitter would probably peek at X in the bathtub, too.

The day the Joneses brought their baby home, lots of friends and relatives came over to see it. None of them knew about the secret Xperiment, though. So the first thing they asked was what kind of a baby X was. When the Joneses smiled and said, “It’s an X,” nobody knew what to say. They couldn’t say, “Look at her cute little dimples!” And they couldn’t say, “Look at his husky little biceps!” And they couldn’t even say just plain “kitchycoo”. In fact, they all thought the Joneses were playing some kind of rude joke.

But of course, the Joneses were not joking. “It’s an X” was absolutely all they would say. And that made the friends and relatives very angry. The relatives all felt embarrassed about having an X in the family. “People will think there’s something wrong with it!” some of them whispered. “There is something wrong with it!” others whispered back.

“Nonsense!” the Joneses told them all cheerfully. “What could possibly be wrong with this perfectly adorable X?”

Nobody could answer that, except Baby X, who had just finished its bottle. Baby X’s answer was a loud, satisfied BURP!

Clearly, nothing at all was wrong. Nevertheless, none of the relatives felt comfortable about buying a present for a Baby X. The cousins who sent the baby a tiny football helmet would not come and visit anymore. And the neighbours who sent a pink-flowered romper suit pulled their shades down when the Joneses passed their house. The Official Instruction Manual had warned the new parents that this would happen, so they didn’t fret about it. Besides, they were too busy with Baby X and the hundreds of different Xercises for treating it properly.

Ms. and Mr. Jones had to be Xtra careful about how they played with little X. They knew that if they kept bouncing it up in the air and saying how strong and active it was, they’d be treating it more like a boy than an X. But if all they did was cuddle it and kiss it and tell it how sweet and dainty it was, they’d be treating it more like a girl than an X.

On page 1654 of the Official Instruction Manual, the scientists prescribed: “plenty of bouncing and plenty of cuddling, both, X ought to be strong and sweet and active. Forget about dainty altogether”.

Meanwhile, the Joneses were worrying about other problems. Toys, for instance, and clothes. On his first shopping trip, Mr. Jones told the store clerk, “I need some clothes and toys for my new baby”. The clerk smiled and said, “Well now, is it a. boy or a girl”

“It’s an X”, Mr Jones said, smiling back. But the clerk got all red in the face and said huffily, “In that case, I’m afraid I can’t help you, sir”.

So Mr Jones wandered helplessly up and down the aisles trying to find out what X needed. But everything in the store was piled up in sections marked “Boys” or “Girls”.

There were “Boy’s’ Pyjamas” and “Girls’ Underwear” and “Boys’ Fire Engines” and “Girl’s Housekeeping Sets”. Mr. Jones went home without buying anything for X. That night he and Ms. Jones consulted page 2326 of the Official Instruction Manual. “Buy plenty of everything”, it said firmly.

So they bought plenty of sturdy blue pyjamas in the Boys’ Department and cheerful flowered underwear in the Girls’ Department. And they bought all kinds of toys. A boy doll that made pee-pee and cried, “Pa-pa”. And a girl doll that talked in three languages and said “I am the Pres-i-dent of Gen-er-al Mo-tors”. They also bought a story-book about a brave princess who rescued a handsome prince from his ivory tower, and another one about a sister and brother who grew up to be a baseball star and a ballet star, and you had to guess which was which.

The head scientists of Project Baby X checked all their purchases and told them to keep up the good work. They also reminded the Joneses to see page 4629 of the Manual, where it said: “Never make Baby X feel embarrassed or ashamed about what it wants to play with. And if X gets dirty climbing rocks, never say “Nice little Xes don’t get dirty climbing rocks.”

Likewise, it said: “If X falls down and cries, never say, “Brave little Xes don’t cry”. Because of course, nice little Xes do get dirty, and brave little Xes do cry. No matter how dirty X gets, or how hard it cries, don’t worry. It’s all part of the Xperiment.”

Whenever the Joneses pushed Baby X’s stroller in the park, smiling strangers would come over and coo: “Is that a boy or a girl?” The Joneses would smile back and say, “It’s an X”. The strangers would stop smiling then, and often snarl something nasty – as if the Joneses had snarled at them.

By the time X grew big enough to play with other children, the Jones’ troubles had grown bigger too. Once a little girl grabbed X’s shovel in the sandbox and zonked X on the head with it.

“Now, now, Tracy”, the little girl’s mother began to scold, “little girls mustn’t hit little -” and she turned to ask X, “Are you a little boy or a little girl, dear?”

Mr. Jones, who was sitting near the sandbox, held his breath and crossed his fingers.

X smiled politely at the lady, even though X’s head had never been zonked so hard in all its life. “I’m a little X”, X replied.

“You’re a what ?” the lady exclaimed angrily. “You’re a little B.R.A.T., you mean”.

“But little girls mustn’t hit little Xes, either!” said X, retrieving the shovel with another polite smile. “What good does hitting do, anyway?”

X’s father, who was still holding his breath, finally let it out, uncrossed his fingers and grinned back at X.

And at their next secret Project Baby X meeting, the scientists grinned too. Baby X was doing fine.

But then it was time for X to start school. The Joneses were really worried about this, because school was even more full of rules for boys and girls and there were no rules for Xes. The teachers would tell boys to form one line, and girls to form another line. There would be boys’ games and girls’ games and boys’ secrets and girls’ secrets. The school library would have a list of recommended books for girls and a different list of recommended books for boys. There would even be a bathroom marked BOYS and another marked GIRLS. Pretty soon boys and girls would hardly talk to each other. What would happen to poor little X!

The Joneses spent weeks consulting their Instruction Manual (there were 246 and 1/2 pages of advice under “First Day at School”), and attending urgent special conferences with the smart scientists of Project Baby X.

The scientists had to make sure that X’s mother had taught X how to throw and catch a ball properly and that X’s father had been sure to teach X what to serve at a doll’s tea party. X had to know how to shoot marbles and how to jump rope, and most of all, what to say when the other children asked whether X was a boy or a girl.

Finally, X was ready.

The Joneses helped X button on a nice new pair of red-and-white checked overalls, and sharpened six pencils for X’s nice new pencil box and marked X’s name clearly on all the books in its nice new book bag. X brushed its teeth and combed its hair, which just about covered its ears and remembered to put a napkin in its lunchbox.

The Joneses had asked X’s teacher if the class could line up alphabetically, instead of forming separate lines for boys and girls. And they had asked if X could use the principal’s bathroom, because it wasn’t marked anything except “BATHROOM”. X’s teacher promised to take care of all those problems. But nobody could help X with the biggest problem of all – other children.

Nobody in X’s class had ever known an X before. What would they think? How would X make friends?

You couldn’t tell what X was by studying its clothes – overalls don’t even button right-to-l eft, like girls’ clothes or left-to-right, like boys’ clothes. And you couldn’t guess whether X lad a girls’ short haircut or a boy’s long haircut. And it was very hard to tell by the games X liked to play. Either X played ball very well for a girl, or else X played house very well for a boy.

Some of the children tried to find out by asking (tricky questions, like “Who’s your favourite sports star?” That was easy. X had two favourite sport stars: a girl jockey named Robyn Smith and a boy archery champion lamed Robin Hood. Then they asked, what’s your favourite television programme?” And hat was even easier. X’s favourite television programme was “lassie” which stars a girl dog played by a boy dog.

Then X said that its favourite toy was a doll, everyone decided that X must be a girl. But hen X said that the doll was really a robot, and that X had computerised it, and that it was programmed to bake fudge brownies and then clean up the kitchen. After X told them that, the Other Children gave up guessing what X was. All they knew was they’d sure like to see X’s doll.

After school, X wanted to play with the other children.

“How about shooting some baskets in the gym?” X asked all the girls. But all they did was make faces and giggle behind X’s back. “How about weaving some baskets in the arts and crafts room?” X asked the boys. But they all made faces and giggled behind X’s back, too.

That night, Ms. and Mr. Jones asked X how things had gone at school. X told them sadly that the lessons were okay, but otherwise school was a terrible place for an X. It seemed as if Other Children would never want an X for a friend.

Once more, the Joneses reached for their Instruction Manual. Under “Other Children”, they found the following message: “What did you Xpect? Other Children have to obey all the silly boy-girl rules, because their parents taught them to. Lucky X – you don’t have to stick to the rules at all! All you have to do is be yourself. We’re not saying if it be easy.”

X liked being itself. But X cried a lot that night, partly because it felt afraid. So X’s father held X tight and cuddled it and couldn’t help crying a little too. And X’s mother cheered them both up by reading an Xciting story about an enchanted prince called Sleeping Handsome, who woke up when Princess Charming kissed him.

The next morning, they all felt much better and little X went back to school with a brave smile and a clean pair of red-and-white checked overalls.

There was a seven-letter-word spelling bee in class that day. And a seven-lap boys’ relay race in the gym. And a seven-layer-cake baking contest in the girls’ kitchen corner. X won the spelling bee. X also won the relay race. And X almost won the baking contest, except it forgot to light the oven. Which only proves that nobody’s perfect.

One of the Other Children noticed something else, too. He said: “Winning or losing doesn’t seem to count to X. X seems to have fun being good at boys’ skills and girls’ skills”.

“Come to think of if, said another of the Other Children, “maybe X is having twice as much fun as we are.”

So after school that day, the girl who beat X at the baking contests gave X a big slice of her prizewinning cake. And the boy X beat in the relay race asked X to race him home.

From then on, some really funny things began to happen. Susie, who sat next to X in class, suddenly refused to wear pink dresses to school any more. She insisted on wearing red-and-white checked overalls – just like X’s overalls, she told her parents, were much better for climbing monkey bars.

Then Jim, the class football nut, started wheeling his little sister’s doll carriage around the football field. He’d put on his entire football uniform, except for the helmet. Then he put the helmet in the carriage, lovingly tucked under an old set of shoulder pads. Then he started jogging around the field, pushing the carriage and singing “Rock a bye Baby” to his football helmet. He told his family that X did the same thing, so it must be okay. After all, X was now the team’s star quarter-back.

Susie’s parents were horrified by her behaviour, and Jim’s parents were worried sick about his. But the worst came when the twins, Joe and Peggy, decided to share everything with each other. Peggy used Joe’s hockey skates, and his microscope, and took half his newspaper route. Joe used Peggy’s needlepoint kit, Peggy started running the lawn mower and Joe started running the vacuum cleaner.

Their parents weren’t one bit pleased with Peggy’s wonderful biology experiments, or with Joe’s terrific needlepoint pillows. They didn’t care that Peggy mowed the lawn better, and that Joe vacuumed the carpet better. In fact they were furious.

It’s all that little X’s fault, they agreed. Just because X doesn’t know what it is, or what it’s supposed to be, it wants to get everybody else mixed up, too! Peggy and Joe were forbidden to play with X anymore. So was Susie, and then Jim, and then all the Other Children. But it was too late; the Other Children stayed mixed up and happy and free, and refused to go back to the way they’d been before X.

Finally, Joe and Peggy’s parents decided to call an emergency meeting of the school’s Parents’ Association, to discuss “The X Problem”. They sent a report to the principal stating that X was a “disruptive influence”.

They demanded immediate action. The Joneses, they said, should be forced to tell whether X was a boy or a girl. And then X should be forced to behave like whichever it was. If the Joneses refused to tell, the Parents’ Association said, then X must take an Xaminiation. The school Psychiatrist must Xamine it physically and mentally and issue a full report. If X’s test showed it was a boy, it would have to obey all the boys’ rules. If it proved to be a girl, X would have to obey all the girls’ rules, and if X turned out to be some kind of mixed up misfit, then X should be Xpelled from the school. Immediately!

The Principal was very upset. Disruptive influence? Mixed-up misfit? But X was an Xcellent student. All the teachers said it was a delight to have X in their classes. X was President of the student council. X had won First prize in the talent show and second prize in the art show and honourable mention in the science fair and six athletic events on field day, including the potato race.

Nevertheless, insisted the Parents’ Association, X is a Problem Child. X is the Biggest Problem Child we have ever seen!

So the Principal reluctantly notified X’s parents that numerous complaints about X’s behaviour had come to the school’s attention. And that after the Psychiatrist’s Xaminiation, the school would decide what to do about X.

The Joneses reported this at once to the scientists, who referred them to page 85759 of the I nstruction Manual. “Sooner or later,” it said, “X will have to be Xamined by a Psychiatrist. This may be the only way any of us will know for sure whether X is mixed up or whether everyone else is”.

The night before X was to be Xamined, the Joneses tried not to let X see how worried they were.

“What if” Mr. Jones would say. And Ms. Jones would reply, “No use worrying”.

Then a few minutes later, Ms. Jones would say, “What if” and Mr. Jones would reply, “No use worrying”.

X just smiled at them both, and hugged them hard and didn’t say much of anything. X was thinking, What if? And then X thought: No use worrying.

At Xactly 9 o’clock the next day, X reported to the school Psychiatrist’s office. The Principal, along with a committee from the Parents’ Association, X’s teacher, X’s classmates and Ms. and Mr. Jones waited in the hall outside. Nobody knew the details of the tests X was to be given, but everybody knew they’d be very hard, and that they’d reveal Xactly what everyone wanted to know about X, but was afraid to ask.

It was terribly quiet in the hall. Almost spooky! Once in a while, they would hear a strange noise inside the room. There were buzzes. And a beep or two, and several bells. An occasional light would flash under the door. The Joneses thought it was a white light, but the Principal thought it was blue. Two or three children swore it was either yellow or green. And the Parents’ Committee missed it completely.

Through it all, you could hear the Psychiatrist’s low voice, asking hundreds of questions, and X’s higher voice, answering hundreds of answers. The whole thing took so long that everyone knew it must be the most complete Xaminiation anyone had ever had to take. Poor X, the Joneses thought Serves X right, the Parents’ Committee thought! Wouldn’t like to be in X’s overalls right now, the children thought.

At last, the door opened. Everyone crowded around to hear the results. X didn’t look any different; in fact, X was smiling. But the Psychiatrist looked terrible. He looked as if he was crying!

“What happened?” everyone began shouting. Had X done something disgraceful? “I wouldn’t be a bit surprised!” muttered Peggy and Joe’s parents.

“Did X flunk the whole test?” cried Susie’s parents. “Or just the most important part?” yelled Jim’s parents. “Oh, dear”, sighed Mr Jones. “Oh, dear”, sighed Ms. Jones. “Sssh”, sssshed the Principal. “The Psychiatrist is trying to speak”.

Wiping his eyes and clearing his throat, the psychiatrist began in a hoarse whisper.

“In my opinion”, he whispered – you could tell he must be very upset – “in my opinion, young X here -”

“Yes? Yes” shouted a parent impatiently. “Sssssh!” sssshed the Principal.

“Young Ssssshhh here, I mean, young X” said the doctor, frowning, “is just about … “. “Just about WHAT? Let’s have it!” shouted another parent. “Just about the least mixed-up child I’ve ever Xamined” said the Psychiatrist. “Yah for X,” yelled one of the children. And then the others began yelling, too. Clapping and cheering and jumping up and down. “SSSSSHH!” Ssshed the Principal, but nobody did.

The Parents’ Committee was angry and bewildered. How COULD X have passed the whole Xamination? Didn’t X have an identity problem? Wasn’t X mixed up at ALL? Wasn’t X any kind of misfit? How could it NOT be, when it didn’t even KNOW what it was? And why was the Psychiatrist crying?

Actually, he had stopped crying and was smiling politely through his tears. “Don’t you see?” he said, “I’m crying because it’s wonderful! X has absolutely no identity problem! X isn’t one bit mixed up! As for being a misfit – ridiculous! X knows perfectly well what it is! Don’t you, X? the doctor winked. X winked back.

“But what IS X?” Shrieked Peggy and Joe’s parents. “We still want to know what it is!” “Ah, yes”, said the doctor winking again. “Well, don’t worry. You’ll all know one of these days. And you won’t need me to tell you.” “What? What does he mean?” some of the parents grumbled suspiciously.

Susie and Peggy and Joe all answered all at once. “He means that by the time X’s sex matters, it won’t be a secret anymore!”

With that, the doctor began to push through the crowd towards X’s parents. “How do you do?” he said, somewhat stiffly. And then he reached out to hug them both. “If I ever have an X of my own,” he whispered, “I sure hope you’ll lend me your instruction manual”.

Needless to say, the Joneses were very happy. The Project Baby X scientists were rather pleased too. So were Susie, Jim, Peggy, Joe, and all the Other Children. The Parents’ Association wasn’t, but they had promised to accept the Psychiatrist’s report and not make any more trouble. They even invited Ms. and Mr. Jones to become honorary members, which they did.

Later that day, X’s friends put on their red-and-white-checked overalls and went over to see X. They found X in the back yard, playing with a very tiny baby that none of them had even seen before. The baby was wearing very tiny red-and-white-checked overalls.

“How do you like our new baby?” X asked the Other Children proudly. “It’s got cute dimples,” said Jim. “It’s got husky biceps, too”, said Susie. “What kind of baby is it?” asked Joe and Peggy.

X frowned at them. “Can’t you tell?” Then X broke into a big, mischievous grin, “It’s a Y!”

A badass with a heart is better than a goody-two-shoes with no sense of moral nuance.

I’m an agnostic (āg-nŏs’tĭk), someone who is noncommittal towards any religion at all but does not professes true atheism either. And since poor, wandering me does not have a religious compass of any sort, I figured I should come up with my own Ten Commandments (agnotiscism, after all, is about subjective conjecture of divine knowledge =P).

Ten Commandments for The Agnostic:

1. Thou SHALL respect freedom of faith, regardless of whether it is towards Muslims, Christians, Catholics, Jews, Buddhists, Taoists, Shintoists, Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Baha’is, Zoroastrians, Manicheans, Pagans, Wiccans, Unitarians, Animists, New Agers, Flying Spaghetti Monsterians etc and no matter how vastly different other people’s faiths may be from thy own, as long as they do not eat children, dump rubbish in thy backyard, hurt the animals or do other nasty things.

2. Thou SHALL NOT distribute unwanted leaflets in public venues, preach from door to door, disseminate thy faith’s propaganda in the mass media or leave unwelcomed proselytizing comments on people’s blogs in excessively irritating and intrusive attempts to promote thy own faith.

3. Thou SHALL fully utilize thy intellectual capability to examine thy own faith, no matter how convinced thee may be of thy faith’s infallibility.

4. Thou SHALL NOT  condemn a person of a different faith will to hell just because he/she professes a different faith nor celebrate a person’s destined path to eternal life just because he/she shares your faith; thou art not God’s secretary.

5. Thou SHALL strive to solve all moral problems with the most equitable, pragmatic and best possible ethical solutions that would satisfy as many peoples and as many schools of moral thought instead of assuming that thy own faith’s religious tenets are absolute and universal.

6. Thou SHALL NOT launch into long-winded revelation stories about how thee emerged from being a lost sheep to becoming an enlightened devotee of thy own faith every time someone casually notes that he/she are of a faith different from thy own.

7. Thou SHALL accord people of different faiths no more criticism and no less compassion than thee would accord fellow devotees of thy own faith.

8. Thou SHALL NOT be overwhelmed with sympathy for people of different faiths just because thy conceited self imagines that they will not live a meaningful or fulfilling life  that thee assumes only thy faith offers.

9. Thou SHALL remember that faith is a personal matter and a personal matter only, and not a country matter, a racial matter, a family matter, a residential matter, a school matter or a peer group matter.

10. Thou SHALL NOT impose these Ten Commandments on people of different faiths. If thee wants to adhere to these Ten Commandments, fine and dandy. But thee SHALL NOT expect nor compel others to follow suit.

005

Above: A statue of the Virgin Mary that was blessed by an old priest and which I inherited it from my late Catholic grandmother. Growing up in a multi-faith family taught me the importance of appreciation for religious diversity, a concept which I wonder might be alien for those who spend their lives exclusively with people who share the same faith.

Facebook note link here.

I don’t care if nobody else cares. All I care is that I care.

If love’s a job, then I’m employed for life.

Hello gorgeous prospective Wellesley schoolmates! I was thinking of writing a Facebook note to break the ice, but I also felt that a typical self-introduction with meaningless trivia about me would be trite and forgettable, and that I should perhaps concentrate on a narrower topic. Hence, I’ve written here a little bit about the socio-cultural background that made me who I am today. It’s damn long, so only read it when you’re free! :-)

My education background:

Your education background would be somewhat different from mine, I suppose. You see, I spent 11 years in a conservative Chinese school environment.

My primary school was steep in Confucian values – self-discipline, modesty, filial piety (the family is the most important institution in Asian society), obedience to authority, thrift, gallantry/chivalry, compassion, the doctrine of the mean, loyalty to race and nation etc.

From Standard One to Standard Six (ages 7 to 12), all 2400+ of us primary school students would sit on a vast concrete cement floor every morning to recite the Analects and other Confucian texts for half an hour. Now, these ancient treatises were all written in classical Chinese, and most of us children could barely swim through their layers of meanings, but memorization of all these texts were greatly encouraged – in fact, expected of us.

Memorization was the default mode of learning anything and everything, and this was induced by the belief within conservative Chinese academic circles that memorization was the most efficient important way of learning. To learn writing, we were made to memorize and dictate one whole essay per day in Standard Six. Even by the time we had progressed to a less demanding secondary school environment, some of my peers still resorted to memorizing the Malay dictionary to ace Malay, or memorizing an entire novel to ace literature.

A prime example of the manifestation of this belief goes like this: In Standard Five, one of the classes next door had a teacher who made the entire class memorize a Confucian treatise called the Da Xue Zhang Ju, and whenever that teacher walked out of the classroom, the whole class of students would immediately drop whatever they were doing, and recite the treatise over and over again in unison like a troop of highly-trained parrots until the teacher returned.

Obedience to authority was rarely questioned. Up to Standard Six, we were subjected to insults and beatings by our teachers (and my mother would encourage it), mostly out of our teachers’ sincere belief that harsh treatment made us better individuals.

Whenever we made mistakes in our homework, my teacher would make us do 30 corrections. For example, if you made a mistake in a mathematical sum, you would have to rewrite the whole sum 30 times. Needless to say, I was subjected to endless corrections (My greatest record was 900 corrections in one day.). To cope with the insane amount of corrections that I had to do, I mastered writing with four pencils simultaneously with one hand.

Not all Malaysian primary schools were as strict as mine, of course; mine happened to be reputed among the Chinese community for academic excellence, and it strived very hard to preserve that reputation, sometimes at the expense of humanity.

I know the case of a multiple-handicapped girl in my school who was subjected to the consequences of the school’s callous pursuit of academic reputation. In spite of the gritty girl’s efforts to excel in her studies, the school authorities felt that the presence of a handicapped person within the community had dented the uniformity and prestige of the school body, and tried to discourage her from coming to school by relocating her classroom to the second floor. The girl persisted, though; she spent an hour walking slowly to the second floor everyday in her mother’s company.

Countless horror stories revolved around the discipline teacher. Once, one of my schoolmates’ explained that she could not attend swimming lessons because she was having her period. The discipline teacher refused to accept her excuse, and pulled down her panties, right in front of her classmates. The girl was traumatized after that.

By Standard Five (age 11), our schoolbags weighed an average of 6-10kg, and we had at least ten assignments per day. Some of the wealthier parents bought schoolbags with wheels for their children. My parents did not buy me one, and as I hated lugging a heavy schoolbag to school everyday, I simply solved the problem by refusing to carry the heaviest text books to school.

Eventually, I progressed to a secondary school which had a much more permissive environment, but most of my schoolmates retained the Chinese work ethic that they inherited from primary school. By Form Five (age 17), the average student in my class spent seven hours per day on classes in school, three hours on after-school tuition, and four to six hours on homework and revision.

The maximum mark allocated for the SPM examination (Equivalent to the equivalent of AP exams or SAT Subject Tests, I suppose) was A1 and as the top school in the state, we were expected to score an A1 for each of the at least 11 subjects we took (In Malaysia, the pursuit of A1s for as many subjects as possible is somewhat of a farce. The national top scorer last year scored 21A1s for 21 subjects. Imagine taking 21 SAT Subject Tests and scoring an 800 for all of them!). On the day our results were released, I remembered watching my schoolmates break down into tears for receiving results like 10A1s and 1A2. In addition to the high expectations from school and family, there was another reason for the cut-throat competition for A1s: scoring straight A1s was one of the only ways of securing a government scholarship.

The doctrine of adherence to authority never went away either. As members of the prefectorial board, we were subjected to meek acceptance of yelling and scolding by our seniors every single day for the slightest mistakes. When I became a senior myself, I repeated the same cycle of viciousness towards my juniors (I remember once, I stared angrily at my junior so badly that she cried on the spot), and it was something I later came to regret greatly, and still regret, today.

On hindsight, I was disillusioned with school right from the first day of primary school. I always had the intuition that something was wrong with the system, though I couldn’t pinpoint what it was at that age. By Standard Four (age 10), I was the most defiant student in school. I refused to do my homework and challenged every word the teacher said, and I happily accepted the punishments that were meted out – being forced to sit in a special seat next to the teacher everyday for three years, sitting beside the drain everyday until I finished my homework, standing outside the classroom, washing school toilets etc. For the rest of my schooling years, I took pride in being an outcast.

This education system had its merits, of course. For one, it produced highly-disciplined, diligent, focused and tenacious individuals, but it came at the expense of intellectual freedom, the freedom of creative expression and the beauty of childhood (I believe). If you ask me, I don’t think it was worth it.

After secondary school, I took one and a half years to pursue the British pre-university course Cambridge A Level in a private college (Which is why I’ll be the oldest, if not one of the oldest students in Wellesley’s class of 2013; I’m already 20.), which was a largely forgettable experience.

95% of the friends I grew up with are now pursuing their further education locally, in environments that don’t differ greatly from where they came from. As much as I loved my alma mater (There’re certain things in which I take pride in my school – the humility of the people, for example.), I made a conscious decision a few years ago not to return to an exam-oriented, Chinese-dominated learning environment, which is why I’m heading to Wellesley College instead of Universiti Malaya.

To a certain extent, I feel that I don’t deserve a Wellesley education at all; I know of so many peers who studied much, much harder than I did, and never had the chance to enjoy a better education experience simply because they didn’t know the opportunities that abound (Another negative consequence of the system: after years of being spoon-fed, you simply don’t know how to seek opportunities for yourself.). I was lucky; after secondary school, I learned how to apply to US colleges on my own, and people encouraged me along the way.

You can say that I’m the epic failure of an education experience that lasted more than half my life thus far; how I ended up as a gay, liberal, multicultural lazy bum and so jarringly different from the character mold in which my school tried so hard to shape me, I can never tell. But I’m satisfied this way.

My country:

Much of the references to Malaysia that you can find on the internet will depict how Malaysia’s a developing, progressive Muslim state and a tropical paradise with a harmonious multiracial population. The most popular image that will come up will be the Petronas Twin Towers, which was once the world’s tallest building.

In truth, it is a nation struggling with a myriad of problems: widespread corruption and nepotism, racial polarization, discrimination towards marginalized communities, lack of media independence, usurping of civil rights etc.

Like the US, racial discrimination is a deeply entrenched problem and is revived time and again by bitterness and suspicion between races. Unfortunately, it is largely engineered by politicking – as long as there’re race-based political parties, there’ll be racism. Fortunately, the emerging generation of young Malaysians (That’s my generation yo!) is much better-informed and racially tolerant than the last one. Another problem that we share with the US is the clash between religious fundamentalists and emerging progressives, although this happens on a much smaller scale vis-à-vis the US because ours is still a dominantly Muslim nation and liberals constitute a tiny minority (half of all the most prominent young liberal activists in Malaysia are on my Facebook friend list, I think, but they create a disproportionate amount of noise in the country.:-D).

You see, in the last few centuries, ‘Tanah Melayu’ (the Malay heartland) was a collective of states governed by various colonisers, both Western and Eastern. By the early twentieth century, waves of immigration had turned the largely Malay population into a multiracial one (My mother was one of the Chinese immigrants who came to Malaysia in search of a better life.). In 1957, we sought independence from the British (who were our last colonisers) and got it, on the basis of inter-racial cooperation.

Unfortunately, the coalition that had been weaved together had comprised of race-based parties (namely, a Malay party, a Chinese party and an Indian party – representing the three main ethnic groups in Malaysia, and a dozen other parties that are too small to have any legitimate influence). To appeal to voters in their respective constituencies, each party resorts to playing to the gallery, and the same ruling coalition has been in power in the 52 years since the country’s independence. Meanwhile, the mainstream media comprise of various newspapers, each one highlighting the interest of a particular racial group, and regulated by a certain race-based party in the coalition.

One of the most divisive issues in my country is the protection of Malay rights. You see, although Malaysia had already become a multiracial country by the time we sought independence, it was still largely believed at that time that the Chinese and Indians were mere immigrants, and the coalition that had sought independence from the British agreed to take steps to ensure that the Malays wouldn’t be marginalized post-independence. Clauses that upheld the priority of the rights of the Malays and Muslims were then engraved in the Malaysian Federal Constitution. Until today, the issue of whether the Malays still deserve special treatment (such as scholarship quotas, positions in civil government etc) are still hotly debated.

In the 60s, a racial riot claimed the lives of hundreds of Malaysians, and fanned the flames of the ‘Malay vs. other races’ hostility. A new economic policy was drafted shortly after to ensure that no race was left behind economically. At that time, the Malays were the poorest deprived racial group, and the policy helped lifted millions of Malays out of poverty. Down the decades, however, the implementation of the policy was pockmarked by nepotism, corruption and inefficiency, and came to be perceived as racist and discriminatory towards non-Malays – again, the necessity of the policy is still a hotly debated issue in Malaysia.

This trend of things finally broke in the last general elections, in 2008, when the opposition succeeded in commanding more than one-third of the seats in Parliament. The opposition, which had comprised of three multi-racial parties, came together and formed an alliance. For the first time, the old notion that race-based politicking was the only form of politics that would survive in Malaysia was seriously under threat. Since then, hostility between the ruling coalition and the opposition has escalated, coupled with the encroachment of civil rights. In the past year, peaceful protest after peaceful protest have been clamped down by police with tear gas and mass arrests, and various dissidents including bloggers and journalists have been jailed without trial.

My own state, Perak (which means silver in Malay, for it was once the tin mining capital of the world), has been hijacked by the ruling coalition. It’s a long story, but basically, it goes like this: the opposition had won the majority and formed the state government last year, but was overthrown by the ruling coalition in a coup marked by bribery, party-hopping and tampering with the judiciary.

Malaysian politics is a fascinating topic, but I’d take me years to recount to you all the juicy historical incidents.

If you ever come to Malaysia, I wouldn’t take you to the Petronas Twin Towers, the dozens of shopping malls in Kuala Lumpur, the overpriced restaurants or other superficial tourist attractions. Rather, I’d bring you for stream-trotting, jungle hiking, experiencing the local independent arts, music and theatre scene, as well as attending the various multiracial and religious festivities and other events which I believe encapsulate the essence of being Malaysia. I’d also buy you a Lat ‘Kampung (Malay word for village) Boy’ comic book, teach you Malay (I’m fluent in three languages and one dialects – multilingualism’s another hallmark of being Malaysian.) and how to appreciate Malaysian humor (which is mostly lame and self-depreciating).

As one of the few and very lucky Malaysian students to have succeeded in making it to the US to pursue further education, I’m inevitably burdened with the unstated expectation of returning to my nation one day to help make it a better place.

The last sentence that I spoke in my Princeton interview (I didn’t get accepted by Princeton.) was, “I don’t want to go to Princeton, full stop. Rather, I want to go to Princeton…and come back with something.”

Over the course of my undergraduate studies in Wellesley, I’ll have four years to contemplate whether I want to keep my words, or be one of the thousands of Malaysian scholars who left the country and never came back.

My religious and sexual identity:

As you probably already adjudged, Malaysia is a deeply religious (and superstitious) and heteronormative society, which didn’t bode well for me.

My father had a habit of subscribing to as many faiths in could (I suppose he’s a greedy man, heh!), and I remember praying in all sorts of temples under his instruction whenever we visited temples during family vacations as a kid. My mother’s family is Buddhist (or Taoist, I’m not sure). I became a hopeful, Bible-reading Christian child under the influence of my eldest sister, and later, a rosary-praying Catholic under the influence of my devout Catholic godparents. I also remember reciting ‘Our Father’ and ‘Hail Mary’ at the beginning and end of everyday’s classes during primary school (Note the interesting amalgamation of different cultures in a Chinese convent school – you were expected to recite Catholic prayers everyday as much as you were expected to subscribe to Confucian beliefs.). I finally decided to become an agnostic two years ago. When I renewed my Malaysian identification card last week, however, I couldn’t register myself as a ‘free-thinker’ (I’d have requested for agnosticism, but it’s an alien concept in my country.) because it wasn’t an option, so I registered myself as a Buddhist instead.

As for religious freedom in Malaysia from a general perspective, Islam is the official religion of the country although religious freedom is supposedly guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. Still, racial- political wars spilling onto the religious turf means that religious freedom has been greatly compromised; as Malays are Muslims by default (Actually, this isn’t true historically, but it’s been imposed by the government anyway.), the dominant Malay parties in Malaysia appeal to Malay voters by depicting themselves as the champions of Muslim rights.

Otherwise, I’m perfectly fine as an agnostic – I’m not embroiled in any of the enmity that usually comes with being a member of a major religion. If I was, say, a Malaysian Muslim, I’d get death threats if I were to decide to convert to another religion someday.

I do, however, have problems with another aspect of my identity – I’m as gay as a rainbow cupcake in a country where homosexuality is a taboo topic. Thus far, not a single political party has either endorse or spoken against LGBT rights as part of their political agenda. In fact, no one ever talks about it, and there’s not a single formal LGBT rights organization in Malaysia. Personally, I don’t think average Malaysians are a highly homophobic – we’re pretty meek and gentle people and I haven’t encountered any problems thus far despite my frank admittance of my sexual orientation. Still, I wish there wasn’t so much silence surrounding LGBT rights.

Most people think that my homosexuality is at least partially influenced by being in an all-girls school for years. Ironically, I was in denial throughout the 11 years that I spent there, and even came to despise the tomboys in my school. I finally came to terms with my sexual identity while studying in a co-ed environment.

It’ll be a new experience for me to return to an all-girls’ school once again, this time sans the guilt and self-loathing. I also look forward to having crushes all over again (Yep you heard that! I look forward to having crushes – feeling nauseous, choking involuntarily and having spontaneous nosebleeds whenever a special girl passes me by. I believe that if life is a plate of spaghetti, then infatuations are the meatballs. :D), this time without trying too hard to conceal them.

For my entire life, I’ve never used my international passport, and my first flight is going to take 30 hours. The next four years will be both a liberating and confusing experience for me, I suppose.

I’m full of excitement and trepidation, but so do you, I guess, and I look forward to making the transition with you. :-)

PS. Now, I figured this note bored the shit out of y’all, and that I should end it with something cute. But since I can’t think of anything cute to write, I’ll, very randomly, put up a photo of the last hamster litter I had. Try and spot the albino! :-D

DSC07643 - Copy

Hugs,

Gabrielle/Yong Wei (whichever you prefer calling me)

Running Schedule

Goal: To avoid embarrassing myself in the 2009 Boston Marathon

Max no. of rounds around football field:

June 8 – June 14: 5

June15 – June 21: 6

June 22 – June 28: 6

June 29 – July 5: 7

July 6 – July 12: 7

July 13 – July 19: 8

July 20 – July 26: 8

July 27 – Sugust 2: 9

Aug 3 – Aug 9: 9

Aug 10 – Aug 16: 10

Aug 17 – Aug 23: 10

Aug 24 – September 7: Break

September 8: Resume training at Wellesley

Target: To run an average of 8 kilometers per day by December 1, 2009 and an average of 10 kilometers per day by February 1, 2010. By the time I graduate, I should have clocked no less than 12,000 kilometers.

My father was a school runner and took part in half-marathons in spite of his poverty. I now enjoy the privilege of access to better food and gym facilities, so I figured I should do better than him.

I’ve always fancied myself as a potential writer, and the following are books that I hope to write someday.

Non-fiction:

1) The emancipation of men – A treatise on what I think will be one of the major thought revolutions in the next few centuries. The profile of the human female has changed drastically in the course of the last 0.1% of human history or so, but the profile of the human male remains almost unchanged even in the digital age, and it remains unmalleable because most of the restrictions on the male role is much more culturally and psychologically ingrained than institutionalized. I know that many books have already been written on the same subject, but none of them have managed to stir the soul or spark a thought revolution in the same way that magnum opuses like The Subjection of Women or The Vindication of The Rights of Women drove the first Women’s Rights Movement in the early twentieth century.

2) A history of the social construction of religion – This is an old proposition, which I feel is often overlooked in the common arguments (the anthropological proposition, the theory of evolution etc)against religion. Please note that my book will be positive rather than normative; it expounds on the proposition that religion is artificially constructed, it doesn’t debate over whether religious is benefitial or harmful, or whether people should or shouldn’t be religious.

3) A warped sense of history - A book that explains the reasons why we are more inclined to empathise with a single case of child abuse that happens next door than with the millions of children who are trafficked around the world each year, or the children who suffered excruciating war penalties thousands of years ago, even though all three events are just as real and devastating, and the profound consequences of the limits of our imagination on our historical records. I want to write about it because it’s an issue that’s been bothering me for years.

4) A revolution in the way we make our books – A proposition on making (I say make rather than write, because there’re more than one way to disseminate knowledge) books highly accessible. Think ‘The Malaysian Tax System’ in comic form and PhD dissertations in colour and size 16 fonts.

Fiction:

1) The child - A story of an extraordinarily precocious, cynical child who is torn asunder by two drastically different sets of self-images, one of a world-weary individual who is inevitably tormented by existential quagmires on a daily basis, and the other of a naive, optimistic child that he is expected to be and pretends to be on a daily basis. The novel questions the long-held convention among child psychologists that cognitive development among children develops gradually in fixed stages.

2) The artist – A novel that begins with a struggling but cheerful surrealist painter. He hits upon an old paradox whereby the works of artists are often unappreciated during their lifetimes. When his beloved wife is struck by terminal illness, he fakes his own insanity by burning his own paintings, acting schizophrenic on the streets etc. The public and ‘art experts’ start clamouring to provide various interpretations of his works and how they were influenced by his supposed mental illness. The painter’s reputation soars and so do the prices of his works. When his wife’s health deteriorates, he commits his last act of insanity. The story questions society’s fixation with novelty.

3) Cyclical – A dystopian sci-fi novel that starts with the weltanschauung of the universe as we see it today. The story ‘progresses’ with the technological ‘progress’ of human civilization until it reaches a stage where mankind has total control of every aspect of the universe – the physical, the cognitive (sort of like how human emotions were manipulated to achieve pain-free states in Huxley’s Brave New World) etc. The story ends with the inevitable self-destruction of civilization and another big bang - the same state in which the story started. The novel challenges our perception of a linear history.

Notes:

1) ‘The child’ will be semi-autobiographical. I’ll provide you an example of the confused childhood I went through: I remember standing up in class during primary school one day, recounting a fascinating piece of news that I’d read about in the papers the day before. It was about a lactating mother who saved seventeen other persons while they were shipwrecked for two weeks by breastfeeding each of them. In an absolutely serious manner, I remarked that I deeply admired the woman’s courage and self-sacrifice. The whole class erupted into fits and laughter; none of my classmates could get over the erotic nature of my story. Even the teacher thought I was an idiot. I went back to my seat amid the bellows of laughter, feeling half humiliated and half confused.

2)  ‘The artist’ is inspired from a short story based on a more common theme I conceived when I was in secondary school, ‘The Injury’. It involved a school boy who faked his own injury and fibbed about imaginary gang fights to win the respect of his peers. When the boy’s ploy is exposed and he is humiliated, he resolves to real self-mutilation. The story questions the cost society pays for its expectations of excessve machismo from young men.

I sat down with my personal shrinks Michelle and U-Jean one Sunday to probe why I’m still frustrated, grumpy and cranky (at least for the last nine months).

After a lengthy dissection, we concluded that the snag was of a purely mathematical nature. Let me demonstrate:

According to the World Factbook, the estimated population of Malaysia as of July 2009 is 25,715,819, of which 49.75%, or 12,793,620 persons, are female.

Assuming I’m a vile racist, the candidate pool for my significant other will shrink to a further 3,032,088 (23.7% of the Malaysian female population).

Add in the fact that I’m now settled in Selangor, which holds 20% of Malaysia’s population, the candidate pool dwindles to 606,418 (neglecting the fact that residents will move in and out of Selangor from time to time).

Of these, Chinese girls between the ages of 19-24 will come to about 60,419 persons.

Assuming that lesbians (5%), bisexuals (5%) and bi-curious girls (15%) make up 25% of any given female population, the candidate pool zooms further down to 15,105.

As a bimbophobic, I’m also adamant that my potential sweetheart cannot be more stoopit than I am, which reduces the candidate pool to a paltry 151.

I’d also prefer if the girl has a Body Mass Index (BMI) of between 17-20, which halves the candidate pool to a pathetic 75.

Friends and good acquaintances know that I discriminate against girls with long hair, so my number of potential girlfriends further diminishes to 25.

After that, it’s impossible to divide the candidate pool to a discrete number by the following factors.

Considering that I’ve still a long list of further requirements – the girl must be very, very proficient in English, the girl must be athletic so we can practice boxing with each other, the girl must possess leftist political views (liberal, pluralistic, pro-civil rights etc) but a rightist character (opinionated, assertive, uncompromising etc), the girl must be able to differentiate latte from espresso, the girl must look, talk and walk like Sinead O’Connor, the girl should preferably be agnostic/atheist, the girl must love animals especially hamsters and chinchillas, the girl must be…Michelle and U-Jean recommended that I look into the China market instead. Either that or I’ll have to hold auditions.

:(

Here’s Yang Jerng’s version (note how it ends with ‘poking girls’):

Re: Why I’m Single

This is an attempt at amusement, a reinterpretation of a friend’s note on the same topic:http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=82988024042&ref=nf

Since I am neither racist, classist, nor nationalistic, I should probably begin by noting that CIA.gov estimated in July 2008 that the Earth’s Population was 6,706,993,152. That’s homo sapiens, baby. 

As Infoplease.com notes, our species exhibits a sex ratio (at birth) of 1.07 males to each female (2008 est.). Since I am a straight male, my target market has been reduced to 3,240,093,310 individuals.

In the spirit of political correctness with regards to the sexual preferences of individuals in my target market, I should then only consider the subset of {straight women, bi-women, and straight-curious gay women}. And if Alfred Kinsey’s research in the 1940s and 1950s into the sexual behaviour of 12,000 men and women in America was right, and if those Americans are still representative of the world today (which they most likely are not)… then the fraction of exclusively homosexual women in the world is 1%… and, aha, I am still left with 3,207,692,377 individuals to choose from.

However…

… if 70% of these women are of legal age, and I wish to not be a preying paedophile, then my pool has shrunk to 2,245,384,664 individuals,

… if 30% of these women are already married, and I wish to not be a hearty homebreaker, then my pool has shrunk further to 1,571,769,265 individuals.

Considering then that I prefer vocally confident partners over sexually repressed, closeted, uncommunicative, culturally docile, or defeatist cold fish, my pool is perhaps reduced further by another 70%, thereby shrinking my pool to 471,530,779 – which is more women than there are people in the United States of America. 

However still…

Of all the eligible, confidant women in the world, many are looking for partners who are emotionally dependent upon them. As I currently have no desire to be emotional dependent upon my partners, my pool is shrunk perhaps by another 97%, bringing it down to 14,145,923 individuals.

Of all the eligible women in the world who seek independent partners, I am assuming that my partners generally have an interest in athletics, because athletic activity is where I derrive most of my happiness in life. Perhaps I am now down to 4% of the remaining pool: 565,837 individuals. Now we’re getting somewhere.

Yet if one wished to narrow the set down closer still beyond the set of “fuckable” women in the world… (a terribly regretable, by stereotypically male meme, which must be included in any parody of the gender)

Of all the actively compatible women in the world, should I choose to seek further potential for a mutually profitable long-term cohabitative relationship, I might actually have to consider only the subset of women who would put up with a jack-ass who would amuse himself by writing an article like this one. That probably narrows the set further to just 1% of the previous figure, to 5,658 individuals.

If I wanted to find someone as conversationally diverse as I am in the long term (a terrifically Mole-ian frame of mind emerges here), the set is further reduced to just 0.1% of the last number, giving me access only to 6 women out of 6 BILLION people on this planet. Oh woe is me…

And since I have met and dated about 3 of those 6 people already…

… and since of the three most compatible people in the world

… one is probably engaged

… one is probably a workaholic

… and, one is probably not living in my neighbourhood (considering that I am myself a workaholic, and unable to meet people outside of my immediate viscinity)

… my probabilities have been reduced to drivel.

And so it is.

(But honestly, I’m probably still single because I spend more time on Facebook studying it’s layout than I do poking girls.)

3290_76256224262_594369262_1717933_4779488_n

Melawati hills

After much encouragement by Amelia and her mother, Auntie Agnes, I agreed to hiking Bukit Tabur last Saturday.

Knowing that I would not be accustomed to strenuous exercise, they guided me with extraordinary patience like I was a baby as I made my away up and down the hill. Mother leading the way in front of me and taking photos of me continuously to encourage me while daughter watched over me at the back, lending me a pair of gloves, bringing extra food and water for me etc.

I also realized, while panting and climbing on all fours for much of the six-hour journey, the drastic deterioration of my stamina as a result of spending about ten hours in front of the computer everyday for the last few months.

3290_76257524262_594369262_1717947_2704176_n

Amelia Lee sitting atop the Lion Rock

Amelia and Auntie Agnes are both avid hikers; Amelia aims to complete trekking all seven of the tallest mountains in Malaysia in the next few months while Auntie Agnes is an advocate for safe trekking. 

Sadden by the spate of accidents at Bukit Tabur in the last few months which included two deaths and one near-death, 49-year old, gutsy Auntie started her own campaign to make Bukit Tabur a safe haven for trekkers. She set up a blog (http://bukittabur.blogspot.com) with photos and safety guidelines on trekking Bukit Tabur, and put up warning signs at risky spots all over the hill.

3290_76339129262_594369262_1719333_3792067_n

View of the dam from between the second and third check point

Apart from the usual panorama of vast skies and miniature buildings one takes in atop a little hill, we saw, among other things, dung beetles, an eagle and a flock of cranes returning to Zoo Negara for meal time.

“For some reason, the cranes in Zoo Negara are not caged up, which is good because that allows the cranes to roam freely.”, said Amelia.

There were two ‘trekking dogs’ (as Amelia calls them) on the hill as well – stray dogs that trekked Bukit Tabur frequently. One of them, Rocky, followed us as we continued our journey and sat down as we paused for rest.

We also saw a hill opposite us, stripped and barren due to ongoing development, Bukit Antarabangsa – the site of the recent landslide tragedy in the distance and another Melawati hill that is facing landslide risks.

3290_76258769262_594369262_1717970_568598_n

With Auntie Agnes

At the ninth checkpoint (the peak), we saw a slightly angry-looking, topless, heavily-tattooed young man walking from the opposite side of our trail towards us. He had seen Rocky alone and asked us if the dog belonged to us.

We said no. He turned back and yelled in Hokkien, “The dog has no owner!”

Two of his friends appeared and stated that they had feared that the owner of the dog had plunged down the hill. One of them explained that he had been waving his shirt in the air to signal rescue.

“Let’s go, you stupid dog”, beckoned the first young man as Rocky followed them down the hill.

“You’ll see the true nature of people”, said Auntie Agnes, “on a mountaintop.”

3290_76330189262_594369262_1719157_3532856_n

Thank you so much, Amelia and Auntie Agnes, for the humbling experience.

amc-debaters-2

Today (April 19) is Ms Liew’s birthday, and this note is dedicated to her.

Back in secondary school, I hated Teacher’s Day. I hated the extravagant celebrations in my humid school hall. I hated the pretentious song dedications. I hated the students’ awful, half-baked attempts at performing, err, titillating pop dances (it was an all-girls school). Most of all, I hated the fact that while the entire school of over a hundred teachers and over two thousand students would sit down comfortably inside the hall to savor the show, the one teacher that I loved most happened to be the discipline teacher, and she would spend every Teacher’s Day (and Report Card Day, and Graduation Day, and ABC Teacher’s Retirement Day, and…) breaking out in sweat, manning the school compound, singling out troublemakers and catching truants. The hardest working teacher in school, working even harder on Teacher’s Day.

The first thing you will notice about Ms Liew is her tall, slim figure, partly due to God-given slim genes, and partly due to fact she has little time to eat. The second thing you will notice about her is her gauntness (sorry lah if you are reading this, Ms Liew!), the accumulated consequence of over two decades of labour from the heart. The third thing you will notice about her, if she opens her mouth, is her crisp, clear, ferocious yet comical voice, which can either reduce even the most defiant delinquent in school to tears, or drive a whole hall of students roaring in laughter.

Witty, sporting and outgoing, Ms Liew was one of the most popular teachers in school. But the students who claimed a special place in her heart were the outcasts: troubled teens, antisocial youths, school rebels and failing students. As much she came down hard on school hooligans, she worked even harder to bring them back within the embrace of the school community. She gave her care to the students who least deserved it, because they needed it most.

Ms Liew was stern, for sure. When the school received complaints from the public that truants were patronising various restaurants in school uniforms, she drove around the school, alone, early in the mornings to round the truants up. And when she scolds you in her trademark crisp, clear, ferocious tone, you would feel your hair standing on it edges. But she also had sneakier ways of changing people’s lives. If she decided that you looked troubled, she would take painstaking efforts to chat you up after school to get to know you better as a person. If she thought that you were isolated and defiant, she would rope you in for cheerleading and other activities so that you would feel involved as a part of the school community. There was also an occasion when she convinced a group of problematic students to take part in a Teacher’s Day performance and give roses to the teachers with whom they usually were on bad terms. The experience transformed everyone a little bit, both the teachers and the students.

In 2007, I successfully nominated Ms Liew for Teacher Idol, a Teacher’s Day tribute organised by The Star. When reporters and photographers from The Star came to take a photo of her, Ms Liew went to the ‘weak’ Arts classes to gather students for the photo shoot. The thrilled students rushed out and carried Ms Liew in the air. The photo was never published, but I understood what Ms Liew wanted to do. She wanted the ‘weak’ students, who never get to enjoy five minutes of fame as straight A students, to have their chance in getting the slightest bit of recognition.

A friend of mine, from another school, once told me the tragic story of two girls in her alma mater who were constantly abused by their father. They finally snapped one day, and engaged their boyfriends to murder him. The two boys were sent to prison, while the girls were sent to a rehabilitation center. I sometimes think that if they had a Ms Liew in their school, tragedies like that would never happen – observant Ms Liew would have singled the solemn-looking girls out for counselling and discover their problems. Or rather, if there were Ms Liews in every school, the world would improve by leaps and bounds.

There were, of course, times when Ms Liew had her fair share of hardcore delinquents who did not budge at kindness. There were vengeful students who tried to intimidate her with mockery and vandalizing her car. But after stern disciplinary action was taken in each of those incidents, there was always, always room for forgiving and reconciliation. Today, countless ex-students return to my alma mater year after year to visit the teacher who had made such a profound impact on their lives.

Ms Liew was my school discipline teacher for many years (she has since been promoted to other positions), but her stint at my alma mater covered many other roles which she performed simultaneously. Among other things, she was the legendary teacher-advisor of the prefectorial board, the English team debate coach, the choral speaking coach (she wrote the script for the team every year), and the default co-ordinator for every major school event. In a nutshell, she was the backbone of an entire school.

joanne-chang-and-ms-liew

I first interacted with her when I was in Form One, but only began seeing her regularly in when I was in Form Three as one of her prefects. At that time, I was still an angry, highly aggressive, defiant teen who had quarrelled with probably half the school’s teacher and student body.

One day, I yelled at a teacher right in front of a whole class so badly that I reduced her to tears (it was sparked by a petty quarrel over her insisting that I make my personal notes in pencil and not pens). I thought that that marked the end of my stint in the prefectorial board and the start of even greater contempt by the school towards me. I expected a heavy lashing by Ms Liew. She did see me eventually, but she never raised her voice at me, nor did she strip me of my position. I later apologized to the teacher that I had scolded. If there was one thing I learned from Ms Liew, it was redemption.

In Form Four, I conjured the courage to write her a 9-page letter one day, with a full list of questions on religion, existentialism, ethics and morality. These were the questions that had brought me a decade of weird stares, isolation and reputation as a weirdo in a conservative, Chinese school environment. Ms Liew met me for a chat in the office one day to reply my questions in that letter. From that day onwards, I no longer felt like an outcast.

Ms Liew had her quirky ways of teaching her students. Once, she told the debaters to research a topic over the weekend in preparation for a practice debate in front of a class. When that day arrived, she gave us our motion an hour before we were due to hold our debate. The motion was entirely different from the topic she had asked us to research, and we suddenly found ourselves with impromptu public speaking skills that we never knew we had.

Another memorable incident occurred during one of the prefectorial board outdoor camps. While going on a night hike one day on Pangkor Island, Ms Liew sneaked up behind us, grabbed the last prefect in the single file and brought her back to the base camp. Amazingly, no one realized that she was missing. When head counts were made back at the base, everyone was traumatized by the knowledge that one of our fellow friends was missing. Ms Liew brought out the ‘missing girl’ a few hours later, and we had a good lesson on accountability and responsibility for others.

My six years of friendship with Ms Liew was never a smooth one. We had our vast ideological differences, and we constantly feuded over disagreements on religious, sexuality and various social issues as well as personal matters, but none of these disagreements were ever severe enough to destroy our bond.

Like all cool teachers, Ms Liew was renowned for her raunchy sense of humour as much as for her intellect. She used to brag that she gave sizzling lessons on reproduction while serving as a biology teacher at an all-boys school. “We even discussed whether cats have orgasms”, she smirked. Another time, when she introduced a new, male teacher trainee into the school, she remarked to an entire hall of students, “We have a new teacher today, and he’s a guy…I can already hear your hormones raging.” In addition, Ms Liew was the first liberal intellect that I knew in my life. After entering the debate team in Form Four, she lent me her stack of socioeconomics, history and political books – the first time I had access to a huge pile of advanced reading material (that was how I felt back then), and which later spurred my interest in those fields.

As an undergraduate student, Ms Liew studied biochemistry. But after some soul-searching, she decided that teaching was her true calling instead. She was, as a Sixth Form student at St Michael’s Institution, inspired by a missionary named Brother Paul who left home at a young age to serve as a teacher in a strange tropical land half the globe away from his country. My mother, who used to loiter around St Michael’s Institution as a child, remembered Brother Paul as a kind man who gave sweets to the poor children in that area and gathered them for Biblical story-telling sessions. To this day, Ms Liew still visits the grave of the man who taught her a life of service every year.

Ms Liew’s life outside the school is no less remarkable. She brought up two lovable Dennis the Menace-lookalikes as if they were her own children. She was friends with the school janitors, the laboratory assistants and the canteen aunties. When one of her Liew’s colleagues and best friend started having difficulties walking, she volunteered to drive her to and back from work every single day. By the time I graduated, she had been doing that continuously for six years.  There are so many other heart achingly beautiful anecdotes about Ms Liew that I would love to share, but it would be impossible to do so without intruding into the personal life of a highly private and humble person. Hence, I will just conclude by testifying that she was so much more than a dedicated teacher; she was also a filial daughter, a caring foster mother, a steadfast friend, a humble intellectual, a perpetual optimist and a faithful Christian. Some people excel at ping pong. Others excel at making cheesecakes. Ms Liew excels at living.

Ironically, Ms Liew never taught me for a single minute in class – I never had the fortune of having her as a subject teacher. And yet, she has taught me more about life than I could ever learn.

me-and-ms-liew1

002

 ”Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon.” – Rorschach, Watchmen

Alan Moore’s Watchmen, my favourite piece of fiction and probably the most celebrated graphic novel of all time, was once hailed by a reviewer for its compellingly realistic characters, all of which have ‘staggeringly complex psychological profiles’.

Among the stellar cast of brilliantly crafted heroes in this seminal work of realism, my favorite would have to be the paranoid Rorschach, not only because his own personal battles epitomized the moral subjectivity that formed the theme of Watchmen, but also because I relate so well to him on a personal level.

005

 Before he was known as Rorschach, Walter Kovacs was born to in 1940 to a prostitute. As a child, he never saw his father, ‘Charlie’ and was abused by his mother. Like so many boys with tainted childhoods, he grew to be aloof and defensive, and became victim to street bullies. He was finally sent to a home for problem children after partially blinding en elder boy, where he proved to be an exceptionally intelligent and athletic adolescent.

Upon release from the home, Walter worked as an unskilled manual worker in a garment factory, where he had to handle women’s clothing. One day, he received an order for a dress made from Dr Manhattan’s (Jonathan Osterman) spinoff fabric from Catherine Genovese, who would later become the victim of the shocking, real-life ‘Kitty Genovese’ murder case. Catherine never took the dress, so Walter trimmed it into the mask with Rorschach ink blots that became his trademark.

He later ventured into vigilantism, but his infamous ruthlessness did not come into the picture until the brutal kidnapping and murder of Blair Roche. His horror at discovering that the little girl had been butchered and fed to hungry dogs drove him to adopt the identity of Rorschach and a lifetime of solitude as well as pursuit of criminals. He was wanted by the police, despised by convicts, misunderstood by his prison psychologist, ignored by his masked hero comrades and loved by no one. When he was told one day that his estranged mother had been murdered, he showed no other response besides commenting, “Good.”

Unlike conventional comic book superheroes, Rorschach had hideous looks and was not formidable-looking at all. He had a small built (he was 5′6”), which he compensated with his extraordinary fitness and agility. Due to his scarred relationship with his mother, he also was never able to have a functional relationship with any woman. Like all the other Watchmen except for Dr Manhattan, he had no visible super powers and relied purely on his investigative smarts, street survival skills and serendipity ala MacGyver. Being penniless, he made do with whatever he had, including snacking on small amounts of food (raw eggs, sugar cubes) whenever he broke into houses. He was, as the Nite Owl II (Dan Dreiberg) described, ‘tactically brilliant’.

Rorschach’s own costume and persona was one that reflected his own minimalistic inclinations. Apart from the ink blot mask, he wore a fedora hat, a scarf, a trench coat, pin stripe pants and elevator shoes. He spoke in monotone, and his expression was perennially blank.

In his quest to be the ultimate morally objective vigilante, Rorschach was detached from the world but he was not emotionally void. Once, he ticked off Nite Owl II with his usual slew of scathing criticism, but he was also quick to offer an apology. Another time, he wanted to punish his landlady who had made false accusations at him, but withdrew after seeing the frightened faces of her child. At the end of book, he was seen bursting into tears as he tore off his mask after asking Dr Manhattan to kill him because he refused to hide the secret that colleague Ozymandias (Adrian Veidt) had masterminded the murder of half the population of New York.

005-copy

Perhaps the only thing that I do not share with Rorschach is his extreme right-wing beliefs and moral absolutism. In the early parts of the book, he was depicted as a doomsday cultist who carried ‘The End is Nigh’ pickets around the streets. He worshipped Harry S Truman for bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima. He was both anti-communist and anti-liberal. In one panel of the book, he suspected Ozymandias to be a homosexual, and referred to it as a ‘personality disorder’. In another scene in the big screen adaptation, he referred to the murder of Silhouette (Ursula Zandt, who was a lesbian) as a result of her own ‘indecent lifestyle’. His moral view of the world, like the viscous ink blot patterns on his mask, was one of black and white boundaries that changed continuously but never mixed.

But for all of Rorschach’s character flaws, he was, in the end, a man who lived misunderstood and died tragically for his staunch personal ideals. He strived for justice and maddening honesty to the point of estranging himself from everyone else, a situation that sometimes, I think, mirrors my own life.

So memorable was Rorschach’s story that despite his short appearance in the 12-issue graphic novel, he has been ranked number six on Empire Magazine’s ‘50 Greatest Comic Book Characters of All Time’, number 16 on Wizard Magazine’s ‘200 Greatest Comic Book Characters of All Time’, and number one on my list of ‘1000 Greatest Comic Book Characters of All Time’.

007

There are countless ironies in life. The fact that our religious institutions are more concerned with persecuting lovers than haters, for example. Or the fact that as a society, we are more comfortable with the idea of men holding guns than holding hands.

To the list, I want to add: the fact that our society’s patriarchal, misogynist notions of female sexuality can be illuminated by, of all things, a piece of legislation that has long been slammed as discriminatory against male homosexuals.

The article on Penal Code 377 reprinted at the bottom was written for Malaysiakini some time back in March against the backdrop of the re-emergence of Chua Soi Lek’s (oral) sex tapes.

For the uninitiated, Penal Code 377, also known as Malaysia’s ‘Unnatural Sex’ Law, contains a total of seven sections (see appendix at the bottom). Of these, four of them – covering bestiality, non-consensual oral and anal sex, non-consensual vaginal sex by foreign object, and inciting a child to gross indecency, I believe, rightly criminalise what are universally agreed to be violent and ethically wrong acts.

The other three, which cover consensual oral and anal sex, as well as ill-defined ‘gross indecency’ are more dubious, The former has been slammed by the international human rights community for violating sexuality rights in the context of consent and privacy, while the latter has been criticized for creating a lacuna for selective persecution of what is deemed as non-heterogeneous behaviour.

While the homophobic nature of the code has been long discussed, I will focus on another curious aspect of the legislation: sections 377A and 377B, which cover consensual oral and anal sex, criminalise only the (obviously male) penetrator but not the penetratee, whether male or female. In other words, the legislation criminalises men and only men.

Thus, there is not a single section in the entire code which criminalises any form of consensual lesbian intercourse: female-to-female oral sex, anilingus, fingering/fisting, tribadism, vaginal and anal penetration by foreign object etc.

At first sight, this may seem to be a cause for celebration for horny lesbians nationwide. Upon closer inspection, this seemingly heaven-bestowed oversight in our legislation sheds light on our patriarchal notions of human sexuality.

Penal Code 377 was drafted by the British colonialists with the aim of cracking down on male-to-male sodomy. The draftsmen, however, never considered including sections prohibiting lesbian sex because lesbian sex, the only form of sex not involving males, was not even considered to be ‘proper intercourse’ then.

One and half century since then, the notion that sex is an inherently penis-driven activity, propagated by a society that is dominated by heterosexual males, continues to permeate our social consciousness. Today, the term ‘oral sex’ is still associated with fellatio (insertion of penis into mouth) by default according to popular belief when by definition, it covers both fellatio and cunnilingus (stimulation of vagina with mouth or tongue). Coitus (penetration of vagina by penis) is still considered to be the ideal form of sexual intercourse over all other forms of sexual intercourse. Orgasm is still defined in the context of the male experience.

I would like to think that it is time to break such long-held notions, for two good reasons. Firstly, so that female sexuality is no longer regarded as inferior or less significant to male sexuality; a prerequisite to gender equality and upholding sexuality rights. It is time to recognise that females too, are equal participants in sexual experience and that yes, penises are not indispensable in the gratifying achievement of female orgasm.

Secondly, when we are finally able to recognise consensual lesbian sex as a legitimate form of intercourse, we shall then also be able to criminalise female-to-female rape and sexual violence, which I believe has been long gravely dismissed as unlikely events in our society.

Oral, anal sex: Controversial acts, but should they be illegal?

Gabrielle Chong

News that the police are contemplating charging Chua Soi Lek for oral sex one whole year after the emergence of his sex tape may have surprised many people.

However, the realisation that both consensual oral and anal sex are illegal in Malaysia will surprise even more people, as these acts are not widely assumed to be criminal.

Under sections 377(A) and 377(B) of the Penal Code, anyone who commits “carnal intercourse against the order of nature” by inserting the penis into the mouth or anus of another person is liable to whipping and imprisonment of up to 20 years.

Penetration must also be sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section.

However, the code only affects the male person who is penetrating another person, while the male or female person whose mouth or anus is penetrated will not be subject to any form of penalty.

Under section 377(C) of the Penal Code, anyone who commits the same act without the consent of the other person is liable to the same penalty, with the exception that he or she will be subjected to a minimum of five years in jail.

Writer and activist Tan Beng Hui, feels that section 377 is obsolete and should be repealed. “The operative word in the code is not consent, but the act of oral and anal sex itself. It is its perceived unnaturalness that is the basis for the harsh maximum sentence regardless of consent.

“Or course, non-consensual anal and oral sex are rightly criminalised, but these provisions should fall under provisions for rape instead.

“How lawmakers deemed it appropriate to include them under an ‘unnatural sex law’ is telling of how the emphasis is on viewing these as acts ‘against the order of nature’ rather than acts that involve violence and coercion,” she said.

Archaic law?

The code, drafted by Lord Macaulay in 1860 with the intention of prohibiting sodomy, was later incorporated into the laws of many former British colonies, including Malaysia.
But while the original code was abolished in the UK in the late seventies and later in several other former colonies, the Malaysian version has never been amended.

On this, Tan commented, “It is a legislation that was introduced into the country under British rule, so it is curious that we not only continue to abide by it but defend its provisions as being in line with Asian values.”

Across the Causeway, section 377, which criminalises oral and anal sex, was repealed in October 2007.

However, section 377(A) of the Penal Code, which prohibited acts of gross indecency between men, was retained in the backdrop of public commotion and heated debate between both proponents and opponents of the code.

The retention meant that oral and anal sex was finally legalised for heterosexuals but not homosexuals.

“They (homosexuals) live their lives. That’s their personal space. But the tone of the overall society, I think, remains conventional, it remains straight and we want it to remain so,” Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had said during the Parliament debate before a petition to repeal section 377(A) was rejected.

Nevertheless, the Home Affairs Ministry in Singapore has promised not to actively persecute anyone under section 377(A) of the Penal Code and prosecutions under that section have been rare.

However, in Malaysia, there has been little or almost no awareness on, much less opposition to, section 377 despite the fact that most human rights groups and activists strongly believe that the code violates the right of adults to sexual relationships within a private environment and the presence of consent.

Social taboos

Feminist activist and researcher Jac Kee admits, “Section 377 of the Penal Code has rarely been tackled by local human rights organisations.

“Although the Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG) has considered taking steps to push for reform, it has been occupied with other pressing matters, especially laws pertaining to rape, divorce and issues involving women’s rights.

“However, much of the lack of activity on reforming section 377 of the Penal Code is also due to paucity of space and willingness for proper discourse on sexuality rights in Malaysia.”

Agreeing that the taboo around sex was an obstacle to abolishing section 377, Tan added that a culture of fear has also hindered Malaysians from raising difficult questions.

“So long as these two obstacles remain, any effort to repeal the section will be difficult because we cannot speak honestly about our views, and hence cannot consider the full range of implications related to sexual matters.

“A third obstacle is related to our inability to separate matters of personal morality versus public morality. What happens within the confines of private life, so long as no rights are being violated, should not be regulated by the state,” she said.

“We should also ask ourselves what it means when the two times Section 377 has received any publicity has been in relation to politicised cases; the first involving Anwar Ibrahim, and now relating to Chua Soi Lek.

“It is not a coincidence that this law has been used to discredit both these men given how it is premised on the demonisation of sexual practices outside intercourse between a man and a woman within the institution of marriage.”

She also noted that a shift in Malaysian mentality towards respecting the privacy and lifestyle choices of individuals was needed before any substantial reforms in laws pertaining to sexuality rights could be attempted.

In 2007, a parliamentary select committee reviewed Section 377 of the Penal Code and the Criminal Procedure Code. However, no amendments were made to the former.

Respecting the tenets of religion

According to Honey Tan, social activist with Empower, two recommendations to amend Section 377 were also shot down during the United Nations universal periodic review held in Geneva last month.

The review is held every three years to draft recommendations to improve human rights protection in member states.

The Malaysian delegation, led by Secretary-General of the Foreign Ministry, Rastam Mohd Isa, noted that it was right to say that the Malaysian Penal Code criminalised oral and anal sex, adding that such sexual conduct was against the tenets of not only Islam, but other major religions in Malaysia.

Chile recommended that Malaysia eliminate standards in the penal code which allow for discrimination against persons on grounds of sexual orientation, while France recommended that Malaysia respect the rights of all individuals, including homosexuals, by de-penalising homosexuality.

However, the Malaysian delegation reported that both suggestions did not enjoy the support of all Malaysians. Hence, it is safe to say that the ban on oral sex and anal sex will probably stay for a long time yet.

Appendix:

Penal Code 377

s(1) 377 — Bestiality
Voluntary carnal intercourse with an animal. Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section. (Maximum penalty: 20 years imprisonment, liable to fine and whipping)

s(2) 377A — Carnal intercourse against the order of nature
Sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature. Penetration is to be sufficient to constitute the sexual connection necessary to the offence described in this section.

s(3) 377B — Committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature
Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be subjected to punishment. (Maximum penalty: 20 years imprisonment, liable to fine and whipping)

s(4) 377C — Committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature without consentCarnal intercourse against the order of nature on another person without the consent, or against the will, of the other person, or by putting the other person in fear of death or hurt to the person or any other person. (Maximum penalty: 20 years imprisonment, liable to whipping, minimum sentence of 5 years imprisonment)

s(5) 377CA — Sexual connection by object
Sexual connection with another person by the introduction of any object into the vagina or anus of the other person without the other person’s consent. However, this section does not extend to where the introduction of any object into the vagina or anus of any person if carried out for medical or law enforcement purposes. (Maximum penalty: 20 years imprisonment, liable to whipping and fine)

s(6) 377D — Gross indecency
Any person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any person of, any act of gross indecency with another person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years. (Maximum penalty: 2 years imprisonment)

s(7) 377E — Inciting a child to an act of gross indecencyAny person who incites a child under the age of 14 years to any act of gross indecency with him or another person. (Maximum penalty: 5 years imprisonment, liable to whipping)

This is a terribly overdue post, but dues must always be paid, so here it is.

To all the friends who took me to the States.

‘Grandpa’ Chen Chow,

You rank very high on my List of People I Greatly Respect for changing the lives of countless Malaysians through your involvement in tons of community service initiatives, taking painstaking efforts to voluntarily review thousands of essays and resumes, helping hundreds of students get into their dream universities every year, advising numerous jobless graduates and worried parents, providing emotional support to suicidal youths, counselling pregnant scholars, rescuing puppies and kittens (okay, I am not sure if you have done the last item, but I am pretty certain that you would if you were asked to) etc without ever asking for an iota of reciprocation, to the point where you have little time left to look after your own well-being. If every person whom you have ever helped, whether directly or indirectly, buys you a KFC meal, I think you would get ten years’ supply of fried chicken. I often feel like smacking all those irritating, whiny kids (and their pesky parents) who exploit your kindness and altruism by demanding all sorts of favours from you, waking you up in the middle of the night with unsolicited calls and smses, and expecting you to solve all of their itsy-bitsy problems, but I also know that you would want us to learn to never turn down a plea for help, no matter how thankless the job may be. Hence, as a gesture of thanks for all the advice and encouragement you have given me (and Tara, and Kim, and Charis, and…), I will, urgh, strive to be less harsh and ill-tempered, and gentler, kinder and a little bit more like you.

dsc08023

(from left) ‘grandpa’ Chen Chow, Kimberley Mei Kay and Tara Thean

‘Mama’ Jing Pei and ‘papa’ Nat,

I would like to thank foster mummy for taking the trouble to drive me home late at night so many times even when she was already whipped, for robbing me of my Murni SS2 virginity, the free chats, the free trips, the free meals, the free pants, the free T-shirts, the free books and most of all, the free understanding and counselling. I would like to thank foster daddy for lame jokes, lessons on pragmatic idealism and patriotism, and of course, the good-willed nagging. When I get to Boston, you guys will remind me everyday of the reasons I need to return to Malaysia.  

058

‘mama’ Goh Jing Pei

dsc05598

‘papa’ Nathaniel Tan

dsc08414

Soh Shen Yee

Shen Yee,

I was very moved the first time you offered to see and counsel me after you discovered my university application plans, even though you were exhausted by jetlag  and had the slightest idea of who I was in real life at that time. And I still am. I cannot begin to describe how assuring it is to have a senior, who shared so many similar circumstance with you, blaze a trail for you. For that, I want to thank you.  

Charis Loke, Tara and Kimberley,

For all the anxiety we went through in the last few months, the self-damning prophecies, the ‘AHHHHHHH I’M DEAD’ smses I shared with Tara, we all made it! As for me, my satisfaction (Tara, I will smack you upside down if you even dare suggest that you are still uncontented) can only intensify with the knowledge that I had to slug it out against formidable peers (and that means you chums). It is always a greater honour to contend against lions than to win against sheep. And now, I have the further honour of spending my formative years in the company of lions (or lionesses, whichever you like).  

001-copy

‘pig’  Teoh Ik Hur

My best friend ‘pig’ Hur,

There is too much that I want to thank you for in our 9 years of friendship, but I will save that for another day. For this occasion, I just want to thank you for your enthusiasm and unconditional support half the globe away, even when you had no little idea of the plans I talk about. I will stuff you with food when I see you in June. 

Wong Wun Min, Andrew Loh, Ng Eng Han, Lim Su Ann, Ngai Jin Tik, Lee Jia Hui and the truckloads of US university undergrduate kids I collectively call ‘The US Gang’ (I am sorry I cannot list down everyone here),

When my interviewers asked me why I chose to aim to go to the States against the Malaysian convention of applying to UK, Australia etc, I told them this: there is one single factor that triumphed all other factors (questionable university rankings, geographical proximity, local culture, admission rates etc) when I set my targets, and that was the character of the students. Although the peers whom I adore and respect study in different corners of the world, no single group has been as patriotic and concerned about the sociopolitical developments in our homeland, as enthusiastic and dedicated in helping prospective applicants, and as idealistic as the peers who study in the States. Each and everyone of you are the walking viewbook of the school you study in. When I saw what your education did to you, I knew I wanted that education too.

A story for Andrew: 

We all change each other’s lives in the most random and least expected ways.

Back in early 2007 and still mopping around the house, I had no idea where I wanted to go. I came across an article on your trip to Dublin in the Star Education one day, and I wondered if you were the same Andrew I watched at ESUM 2006. Curious, I looked you up on the internet and found your blog. At first sight, I thought, ‘Where the hell is Swarthmore and why would anyone accomplished want to go there?” So I googled ‘Swarthmore’. The rest, as they say, is history.

One of my pet peeves is strangers who add me on Facebook without bothering to introduce themselves or taking the initiative to get to know me better, as if I am, in Ashleigh Goh’s words, ‘a collectible item’. I believe that the way you converse online reflects the way you carry yourself in the real world, and I would like my Facebook friend list (it has a limited capacity of 5000, after all) to consist of people whom I trust I would be comfortable meeting in real life.

I also usually ask the standard question, “Hello, have we met?” to strangers who add me on Facebook, and I usually confirm them if they bother to respond with a decent reply that reflects an amiable character.

The following, however, are a list of real, ‘classic’ replies I have received from strangers whom I ignored, copied-and-pasted from my Facebook message inbox.

Q: Hello, have we met?
A: No. (comment: Very honest, I like.)

Q: Hello, if you’re a 43 year old woman as you self-described, why’d you want to add a teenager you’ve never met?
A: hye,have u play the “Texas,hold em” application be4?if no,check ur self,many other country from young to older bit btw 13-60+ playing that application…facebook is not just for ya teenage k?is for everyone!or if u having some problem with the olders people,i advice u to find ur docter for some medical treatment,coz every1 will be old some day….k?

Q: Hello, have we met?
A: i dunno leh…where do u live?i am in ipoh.
Q: So why do you want to add someone you’ve never even met?
A: cant meh?juz add onli mah….

Q: Hello, have we met?
A: hahah i also dont really regozine you too. thats why i need to addyou that i confirm wheather i know who are you extactly. my really name is (…). i bet you dont know me. but i know who are you by tell your chong yong wei name’s

Q: Hello, have we met?
A (a guy): Whoops sorry, I thought you were a cute guy.

Q: Hello, have we met?
A: Yes we have. Damn you for not remembering. Damn you.
Q: Okay, so did I meet you at MSLS or something?
A: I also don’t remember where we met.

****My favorite****

Q: Hello, have we met?
A (a guy): havent.. but maybe we can start blossoming our love affection slowly unto me,….? how? can u see us fated 2gether?

To be honest, I am very hesitant to release my actual results in the US university applications after failing what I think were very high expectations too many friends had of me. But I also suppose that real life experiences, the good, bad and ugly, offer a clearer glimpse into the real world of university applications than the usual vague comparisons of past year applicants, hearsay as well as over-optimistic advice and recommendations.

Hence this post, written for my juniors and future Malaysian applicants.

CURRENT SITUATION

Brief background description:

I come from a working-class family. I grew up in Ipoh, and studied in SRJK and SMJK Ave Maria Convent. Both my parents attained secondary school education. No one in my entire extended family excelled academically. Both my parents do not earn enough to pay income tax. Both my elder sisters studied diploma programs at Kolej Tunku Abdul Rahman (KTAR) after completing SPM.

I knew that going to a local university or college would be the safest and cheapest route for me and my family, as there was absolutely no way that my parents could afford to send me to a foreign university. But at the same time, I also wanted something better than what my sisters had, so I took a gamble: I asked my parents to give me the chance to pursue Cambridge A Level. Apart from having the opportunity to study in a more internationally-renowned pre-university course, I knew that interaction with the middle and upper class crowd in Taylor’s and Klang Valley would give me the cultural capital that I was lacking in. My parents gave me full support, and sent me to Taylor’s University College Subang Jaya, even though it took a huge chunk out of their savings.

My plans for tertiary education were a simple: I would try to get admitted into one of the top US schools with full or nearly full financial aid. Should I have failed this course, I would have taken a 100% loan, study at the National University of Singapore (NUS) and sell my soul to the island.

In 2008, I applied to the following US schools:

Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Dartmouth, Williams, Amherst, Wellesley, Middlebury, Smith, Macalester (11)

Reasons for applying to these schools:

My dream school is Harvard, even though generally, I have a slight preference for small liberal arts colleges over huge private universities because I think thrive in small, close-knitted communities. Overall, I applied to schools that are traditionally strong in the humanities and social sciences, because I wanted to major in these fields.

Apart from Harvard, I applied to Yale and Princeton, because of their obvious advantages in resources and international reputation; to Columbia, because of its unique compulsory classes on Greek and Western philosophy; to Dartmouth, because of its focus on undergraduate education; to Williams, Amherst, Wellesley and Middlebury, for their reputation as excellent liberal arts colleges; and to Smith and Macalester, as ‘safety schools’.

My order of preference was:

1 Harvard

2 Princeton

2 Yale

4 Williams

4 Wellesley

6 Columbia

7 Amherst

8 Middlebury

9 Dartmouth

10 Macalester

11 Smith

In 2009, I got my results:

Harvard — rejected

Princeton — rejected

Yale — rejected

Columbia — waitlisted

Dartmouth — waitlisted

Williams — waitlisted

Amherst — rejected

Wellesley — accepted

Middlebury — waitlisted

Smith — rejected

Macalester – rejected

My decision:

I have decided to take myself out of all four waitlists and attend Wellesley, for its 1) illustrious history of producing prominent women leaders (go Hilary Clinton!) 2) strength in the political science, government and international relations departments 3) proximity to Boston and opportunities for students to take classes at Harvard, MIT, Babson, and other colleges 4) liberal environment and gung-ho activist community 5) emphasis on cultural diversity and 6) suburban environment and huge, beautiful campus.

PERSONAL PROFILE

SAT Reasoning Test scores:

1st attempt: CR 680, MT 700, WR 600 (the first time I took my SAT test, I had absolutely no idea what the format was like)

2nd attempt: CR 730, MT 780, WR 720

SAT Subject Test scores:

World History 750, US History 660, Mathematics I 720

Cambridge A Level results:

Law B

Economics B

Mathematics C (okay I will admit that I did not do a single page of math homework or math practice outside the exam hall during my last 12 months in Taylor’s)

Sociology A

Weaknesses:

– Dismal Cambridge A Level results.

– Mediocre SAT results.

– I requested for close to 95% in financial aid from every school I applied to.

– Not a single conventional leadership position in extra co-curricular activities.

– Lack of cultural capital (studied in government school, family knew little about tertiary education opportunities).

– Not a single outstanding achievement or extraordinary talent.

– No internet access at home (I completed my university application by either stealing my neighbour’s insecure wireless or going to the internet café).

– Procrastination (I wrote about 15 essays in the last five days before the application deadline for all schools).

Strengths:

– Unique life experiences (good resource for writing and self-introduction during interviews).

– Well-read and a very strong grasp on general knowledge.

– Unconventional co-curricular achievements e.g. LGBT activism (founding an LGBT rights website, winning a human rights public speaking competition with a speech on gay rights and outing myself in public), working for the alternative media (Malaysiakini), minor awards for creative writing, strong activism and community service track record, founding a book project, a string of unconventional hobbies and interests (comic drawing and Muay Thai, anyone?) etc.

– Personal, articulate recommendation letters

– Good essays (according to my peer reviewers anyway).

– Good communication skills (for interviews, personal opinion).

– Abundant working experiences

– Unconditional support from my family (my parents are hopping in joy over my admission into Wellesley, even though they have no idea where the hell it is!).

– Genuine passion for, and sincerity in, everything I pursue.

Common Application Essay:

(The essay was written on December 30, 2008, the night before the application deadline. I realized that many lines in the essay sound trite, but they were honest words.)

It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. – Dumbledore

As I went through my application, I realized that everything else I submitted were relics of my past. Recommendation letters that were already signed, sealed and delivered, disclosing stories about the person that I was. A resume detailing the endeavours undertaken during a teenage hood to which I will be bidding farewell. Test scores that, whether superb, mediocre or downright abysmal, I can never change again. But the past tells you very little of what a person can achieve in the future; it only tells you where that person has travelled and where that person is standing right now, but nothing about that person’s destination. And so, I want to tell you about my dreams and passions, for dreams are what drive me forward and passion is what determines how far I will go.

As a kindergartener, I would flip through the newspaper, look at photos of rotund businessmen, emaciated famine victims, dignified politicians and weary rioters, and then ponder on end for hours on why some people lead lives so vastly different from mine. At 11, I wrote my first letter to a newspaper about a problem in my neighbourhood (it is, to my knowledge, the only letter ever printed in a local newspaper in its original, big, oafish handwriting). At 15, I bombarded my favourite teacher with a 9-page letter filled with questions on ethics and religion (my teacher was astonished, but from then onwards, she would chat with me whenever she was free to mentor me on lessons beyond the classroom). I cannot remember how I became so fascinated by society at such a young age in a household where socioeconomic and political issues were never a staple of dinner conversations. Perhaps it was sheer curiosity. All I do know is that the same questions that intrigued me as a child have continued to haunt the depths of my conscience until this very day: Why do inequality, war, poverty, crime, and oppression occur? How should we solve them? And what can I do?

This is my greatest dream of all: to join the ranks of millions of journalists, educationists, political activists, writers, artists, social workers and other unsung heroes who serve with dedication everyday in, to borrow an oft-quoted phrase, making the world a better place for all of us. I do not have a specific ambition in mind yet, but whichever vocation serendipity will eventually lead me to, I will serve with earnest passion, I will walk the extra miles and I will exhaust all I have to make lasting, meaningful contributions to society. There are so many causes that I wish to champion: democracy, human rights, economic equity, a minimum standard of living for all etc. I cannot name them all. But underlying my passions for all of them is the same ideal: peace, justice and equality for all men and women.

But to achieve all that I aspire, I need a little place to stand on so I can move the world. A little platform called education. Education that will equip me with the knowledge and inspiration to fight ignorance and indifference. Education that will place me at the crossroads of the world, so that I can look far into the path ahead and prepare myself for what the journey will take. And so, as I pursue that precious opportunity for education, I hope that I will be judged, more than anything else, on not only what I have done, but also what I can do.

dsc05120

The stack of school reports and teacher evaluation letters I sent in as the first part of my application

Scholarships:

None. I have been rejected in every scholarship that I have ever applied for. I did not attend the United World College (UWC) interview in 2007 because I knew that my parents could not afford the remaining expenses even I succeeded in getting a partial scholarship. I am currently vying for the MACEE study grant to foot my remaining expenses to study at Wellesley.

Some advice for future applicants:

1. Do not dismiss or look down on the smaller or less prestigious schools. If you have decided to enter any of these schools, make sure that you leave the school a better and improved one. ‘Prestigious universities’ are what they are today only because they have enjoyed economies of scale amassed over a long period of time. It is not the school that makes the students, but the students that make the school.

2. If you come from a socioeconomic background similar to mine, do not whine or complain about it. Just make sure you work ten times harder than I did and you will get somewhere.

3. Regardless of what you get in the end, do not forget to thank those who have helped and supported you, and do not forget to give back.

4. At the end of the day, education is what you make of it.

CONCLUSION

In hindsight, I am glad that I took the gamble in attending Taylor’s. I am also thrilled that I succeeded in making it to the United States against the odds. For future applicants who are disappointed with their academic performances, I hope you take assurance from my personal experience that the lack of straight A’s can always be compensated by countless other strengths. I am also infinitely thankful for unwavering support and faith from my family and close friends.

I received my letter from Wellesley this afternoon. I asked for 95% in financial aid, but they are giving me 98%.

Come this September, I will be stepping onto an airplane for the first time in my life.

And when I graduated in four years time, it will be my father’s turn.

Chong Yong Wei, Gabrielle

April 3, 2009

A little project which I initiated and, I hope, will be my small way of giving back to my peer community in which I grew up and to which I am indebted:

 

One book. One hundred stories.
For you. For hundreds of thousands of Malaysian youths.
(Yes you heard that right – hundreds of thousands of readers!)

For most of us, the end of secondary school education (or the lack of it) marked a turning point in our lives where we moved from studying together under an umbrella education system (SPM) to embarking upon vastly different pathways.

The transition process for the more fortunate among us would no doubt have been aided by the various resources made available to us: school counselors, advice from worried parents and knowledgeable seniors, counsel from helpful relatives, visits to campus open day sessions, mountainous stacks of college brochures, education sections in local newspapers, education resource websites etc.

The same, however, cannot be said of hundreds of thousands of kids all over Malaysia who have no regular access to the internet, are not blessed with well-informed family and friends, and who complete secondary school with little or almost no awareness of the opportunities that abound for them, as well as kids who are simply ignorant of the opportunities that surround them or just do not possess the faith and self-confidence to pursue their passions.

Therefore, we have decided to spearhead this project in hopes of reaching those kids and sending them this message: “Look, kids, now that you have completed secondary school, there are a million opportunities out there for you, a million pathways that you can undertake, a million places to visit, and you should explore those choices as much as you can. You can do anything you set your mind to. All it takes is keyakinan, a little bit of strategi, a little bit of tuah, and lots and lots of semangat dan usaha.”

We are now looking for a plethoric collection of stories of young Malaysians who have pursued different pathways after SPM. The stories will be published in a book to be distributed to as many students and secondary schools as possible (tentative target: to distribute at least 2 books to each of the 5000 secondary schools in Malaysia). And we would like to invite you to participate in this project by submitting your story, or persuading your friends to submit their stories.

It does not matter whether you are a scholar with stellar results and a 3-inch thick resume, a typical student who went to a local university after finishing Form 6, or a youth who has to work in the pasar malam at night to foot your technical college fees in the day. It does not matter whether you have chosen the oft-beaten path or the road less travelled. We believe that there every education background offers its own boons and banes. And we believe that there are merits in telling any story.
 

 
TOPICS
 
Participants may touch on all or concentrate on a few of the following topics:

(a) What socioeconomic/education background did you come from and how did it contribute towards making you the person that you are today?

(b) What obstacles did you face in pursuing tertiary education and how did you overcome those obstacles?

(c) What prompted/who inspired you to pursue the pathway that you have undertaken/are currently undertaking?

(d) How did you find out about the pathway that you have undertaken/ are currently undertaking?

(e) What are the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing the pathway that you have taken/are currently undertaking?

(f) If you have had had a unique education background, please elaborate on your unusual circumstances (Examples: kampung boy who ended up in Yale University/home-schooled girl who faced difficulty persuading university admissions officers to admit her/student who pursued cosmological astrophysics at Cambridge under the prestigious Gates Scholarship/teenager who dropped out of school and pursued full-time modelling/youth who took a gap year after SPM to participate in humanitarian missions in Tibet/boy who has worked as a professional computer hacker since age 14/youth who entered a seminary to pursue priesthood/student who designed a new degree course at Smith College).

(g) If you have succeeded in securing a rare/prestigious scholarship/ undergone a rigorous university application process (Examples: Kofi Annan International Scholarship), please elaborate on the application process.

(h) What advice would you give to someone who hopes to pursue the same pathway that you have undertaken/are currently undertaking?

(i) How was the experience at your previous/current place of study and how has it changed your life? If you have had a non-academic pursuit (s) (establishing your own restaurant/working full-time as a social worker etc), how has your pursuit impacted other people?

(j) Is there any other issue regarding post-SPM education that you wish to discuss? What other pertinent advice would you give to someone who is about to complete SPM/secondary school?

Reminder: Remember that the purpose of submitting your story is not to flaunt your achievements, but to share your unque experiences with your readers. As you write, try to retain the relevancy between your experiences and the reader’s interest.

Malaysian children: dreams come in all packages (image from pro.corbis.com)

PARTICIPATION RULES 

1. Participants must be Malaysian citizens.
 
2. Participants must be of age 30 or below as of 2009.
 
3. Each entry will consist of a photo (to be printed in black & white), an introduction blurb written in 3rd person perspective and a main article written in 1st person perspective.
 
4. The introduction blurb is to be between 30-50 words, and must mention the participant’s age and place(s) of study/pursuit (see below for examples).
 
5. The main article is to be between 600-800 words.
 
6. All articles are to be written in English. Participants who struggle with English may write in Malay/Chinese and have their articles translated by the committee members.
 
7. Articles may be edited for clarity, brevity and/or intelligibility, though the committee will strive not to tamper them.
 
8. All participants must use their real names. Pseudonyms will not be allowed.
 
9. About 100 entries will be selected for publishing. The committee’s decisions will be final.
 
10. Photos may be of any style as long as it shows the participant’s face, though black & white photos will be preferred as the book will be published in black & white.
 
11. All participants will retain the copyright of their articles and photos.
 
12. All entires are to be sent to whatsafterspm@gmail.com.
 
DEADLINE
 
March 31 2009
 
DIVERSITY
 
We encourage young Malaysians from all walks of life to participate in this project. We strive for inclusivity and diversity in terms of:
 
(a) Socioeconomic, ethnic and geographical background of participants
(b) Secondary school background of participants (national schools, vernacular schools, international schools, private schools, religious schools, boarding schools, home-schooling, apprenticeship, dropouts etc)
(c) Pre-university education background of participants (STPM, matriculation, A Level, IB, SAM, ICPU, AUSMAT, ADP, foundation program, diploma, home-schooling etc)
(d) How did you find out about the pathway that you have undertaken/ are currently undertaking?
(e) What are the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing the pathway that you have taken/are currently undertaking?
(f) If you have had had a unique education background, please elaborate on your unusual circumstances (Examples: kampung boy who ended up in Yale University/home-schooled girl who faced difficulty persuading university admissions officers to admit her/student who pursued cosmological astrophysics at Cambridge under the prestigious Gates Scholarship/teenager who dropped out of school and pursued full-time modelling/youth who took a gap year after SPM to participate in humanitarian missions in Tibet/boy who has worked as a professional computer hacker since age 14/youth who entered a seminary to pursue priesthood/student who designed a new degree course at Smith College).
(g) Fields of interest of participants (pure sciences, arts & humanities, social sciences, medicine, law, engineering, entertainment, culinary arts, business, entrepreneurship etc)

EXAMPLES OF INTRODUCTORY BLURBS

(a) Mohammad Ghazali, 18, is currently setting up his own football memorabilia business at Berjaya Times Square with his ex-classmates after completing SPM at SMK USJ14. He spends his free time coaching orphans in football for free. He also owns a personal collection of jerseys autographed by over 50 Manchester United players, and wants the Devils to reclaim the English Premier League

(b) Tee Le Yin, 26, a former national swimmer and philately enthusiast, studied A Level at Hwa Chong Institution, Singapore under the ASEAN scholarship prior to pursuing War Studies in King’s College, UK. The former national swimmer is currently pursuing her MBA at INSEAD, France under the Maxis scholarship.

BOOK SPECIFICATIONS

1. The book will be printed in black & white to minimise production cost and market price.
2. The book will be between 200-300 pages thick.
3. The book will be published by end of 2009.

ROYALTY/PAYMENT

1. As this is a community service project, none of the participants, project committee members and project advisors will receive any form of royalty or payment.
2. A fund raising campaign will be held later to raise money for the project. However, all excess funds will go towards distributing the books to students and secondary schools for free.

ENQUIRIES/CONTACT
 
The organising committee members, Chen Chow Yeoh, Chong Yong Wei Gabrielle, Goh Jing Pei, Kimberley Mei Kay, Tara Thean, and Charis Loke are not committed to any organisation. They were simply brought together for this project and are bound by their sincere enthusiasm for community service.
 
Participants, parents, interested sponsors and translators, as well as general inquirers may contact committee at whatsafterspm@gmail.com.

The following is a Malaysiakini article of mine that was not published. Still, I have put it up here because I think that it is something that Malaysians should get to read about in the news instead of nude pic scandals and other imbecilic stories. I apologise for not writing in a more humanistic manner, but I still hope you get the message of the story – that we can be far from the apathetic, uncaring and self-centered Malaysians that we often perceive ourselves to be.Thaipusam miracle at Batu Caves
Feb 16 2009

50 Sampah Masyarakat volunteers performed the ultimate miracle last Monday – they cleaned up all the rubbish Batu Caves one day after Thaipusam – all approximately 2400 cubic meters of it.
www.malaysiakini.com/news/97562

Anyone who has ever visited Batu Caves during the annual Thaipusam celebration will have witnessed the gargantuan amount of rubbish left behind by 1.3 million devotees every year. And yet, despite the mountainous odds, the volunteers left the place without a trace of filth.

before9

Now you see it…

Armed with only gloves, rakes and shovels provided by Alam Flora, the volunteers had to clear, under the scorching sun, towering heaps of putrid baby diapers, Styrofoam boxes spilling with rice, piles of coconut husks, discarded shoes and containers filled with fermented milk.

‘Sampah Masyarakat’, the brainchild of Shyam Priah, 35, was formed as an organization to tackle the Malaysian malady of littering through voluntary cleaning efforts.

At the beginning, a total of 100 persons had pledged to volunteer for the Thaipusam clean-up for 12 hours but when only 50 turned up, the clean-up time had to be cut to 6 hours.

The volunteers were then dispatched to nine different zones in and around Batu Caves to clean up different places. The rubbish was disposed at nine huge ro-ro (roll-on, roll-off) bins strategically placed around the place.

“I would say that we were insufficient but efficient.

20 minutes after the clean-up began, I could hear volunteers cheering loudly after succeeding in cleaning up a rubbish pile. The cheers continued throughout the entire clean-up, and I think that mutual encouragement kept our spirit going whenever we felt overwhelmed by the intimidating amount of rubbish.
Some of the vendors were also very thankful for our help and wished us well”, recalled Shyam.

The volunteers include doctors, managers, system analysts, engineers and a CEO. One of the volunteers had travelled all the way from Seremban just to participate in the clean-up, and another two elderly Chinese tourists were so impressed with the group’s efforts that they joined in on the spot.

“Despite the fact that this clean-up was concentrated on a place of worship for mainly Hindus, only 6 of the 50 volunteers were Indians; the rest were Chinese and Malay. And this is exactly what I wanted – a multiracial effort.

If you think that Malaysians are generally uncaring and apathetic, this is the sort of event that will totally change your perception.

It requires dedicated, committed people to wake up at 6am in the morning just to volunteer for something as humbling as cleaning up tremendous piles of other people’s rubbish. And here we have just that – strangers coming together and sacrificing for a cause they believe in.

It was not just the enormous amounts of rubbish that made our work difficult. Some of us were not tall enough to throw the rubbish sacks into the huge ro-ro bins and we had rubbish spilling onto our faces.

By the time the clean-up finished, we had grim and dirt in our hair. I suffered sunburn for days after the clean-up and I dirtied my car too.

Nevertheless, the feeling of satisfaction more than made up for the effort we gave. It was only while driving home (in a dirtied, stinking car) that the feeling of ‘Wow! I actually cleaned up Batu Caves!’ hit me.’

As for the volunteers, they felt so empowered, motivated and inspired that they immediately discussed about plans for future projects right after the clean-up”, added Shyam.

The next Sampah Masyarakat clean-up will be held on Wesak Day. Again, members of the public will be invited to participate in the event.

after8

…now you don’t!